Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2004
Phase II study on 9-nitrocamptothecin (RFS 2000) in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial tract tumors.
Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the antitumor activity and the safety of RFS2000, an oral topoisomerase I inhibitor, in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial tract tumors refractory to one prior chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND
methodsEligible patients were to have failed first line treatment for advanced or metastatic disease. Patients received RFS2000 as one daily oral intake at the dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day according to a "5 days on/2 days" off schedule continuously. One cycle was arbitrarily defined as a 3 week period. Sufficient oral fluid intake to prevent cystitis previously described in phase I trials with RFS2000 was recommended. Gehan design was used for sample size determination. Anti-tumor activity was evaluated according to the RECIST criteria and toxicity according to CTC version 2.
resultsTwenty patients received a total of 57 cycles (range 1-8). Grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 10 patients requiring dose or schedule modifications. Hematological grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 16% of the cycles. Only one patient experienced a partial response.
conclusionsRFS2000 could be administered orally as a "5 days on/2 days off" schedule continuously with a median dose intensity of 90.6% with an acceptable toxicity profile. However, RFS2000 did not exert significant activity in patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial tract tumors failing prior chemotherapy. The results of this study do not suggest further investigation of RFS2000 at the present dose and schedule for the treatment of urothelial tract tumors in this refractory population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.