Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2004
Phase I trial of vinorelbine and diphenylhydantoin in patients with refractory carcinoma.
Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledThe anti-epileptic diphenylhydantoin (DPH; Dilantin) selectively enhances the in vitro cytotoxicity of vinca microtubule poisons in both parent sensitive and multi-drug resistant (MDR) human tumor cells. The in vivo clinical activity of this combination has not been fully evaluated. PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and preliminary antitumor activity of the combination of intravenous (IV) bolus vinorelbine (VRL) and oral diphenylhydantoin (DPH) in patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors.
methodsCohorts of 3-6 pts with refractory cancer were treated with escalating doses of weekly IV bolus VRL (I -20.0 mg/m(2); II -22.5 mg/m(2); III -25.0 mg/m(2); IV -27.5 mg/m(2); V -30.0 mg/m(2); VI -32.5 mg/m(2)) combined with a fixed oral dose of DPH (400 mg/day) until MTD or progression. During each 35 day cycle, pts received DPH 400 mg/day administered orally on Days -6 to Day +22 and weekly IV bolus infusion of VRL on Days +1, +8, +15, and +22. The cohort treated at the MTD was expanded to further define toxicity.
resultsA total of 25 evaluable pts. (9 men; 16 women) were treated with VRL and DPH at dose levels I ( n = 5), II ( n = 3), III ( n = 2), IV ( n = 3), V ( n = 7) and VI ( n = 5) in 5 week cycles over a 16 month period. Dose limiting toxicity occurred at dose level VI (VRL 32.5 mg/m(2)) and included grade 3 leukopenia ( n = 2), grade 3 neutropenia ( n = 1) and grade 4 neutropenia ( n = 1) occurring within the first cycle of treatment. There were no responses, however 9 pts had stable disease of variable duration (8-56 weeks) and received a median of 2 cycles of treatment (range 2-14).
conclusionIntravenous bolus administration of VRL and oral administration of a fixed dose of DPH was well tolerated according to the schedule reported here. Although there were no responses, several patients had prolonged disease stabilization. The recommended phase II dose of VRL when used in this combination is 30 mg/m(2).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.