Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15122047›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2004

Preclinical safety testing of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals: understanding the issues and addressing the challenges.

Frank R Brennan, Leigh Shaw, Mark G Wing, Christine Robinson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Precise Personalized Medicine in Gynecology Cancer and Infertility.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Targeted nanoparticles for colorectal cancer.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2016
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frank R BrennanHuntingdon Life Sciences, Woolley Rd, Alconbury, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE28 4HS, UK. BrennanF@UKOrg.Huntingdon.com
Leigh Shaw
Mark G Wing
Christine Robinson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unique and complex nature of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals has meant that it is often not possible to follow the conventional safety testing programs used for chemicals, and hence they are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Nonclinical safety testing programs must be rationally designed with a strong scientific understanding of the product, including its method of manufacture, purity, sequence, structure, species specificity, pharmacological and immunological effects, and intended clinical use. This knowledge, coupled with a firm understanding of the regulatory requirements for particular product types, will ensure that the most sensitive and regulatory-compliant test systems are used to optimize the chances of gaining regulatory approval for clinical testing or marketing authorization in the shortest possible time frame.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiotechnologyDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGuidelines as TopicHumansPharmacokineticsRecombinant ProteinsReproductive MedicineTechnology, PharmaceuticalToxicity TestsVaccinesAntibodies, MonoclonalRecombinant ProteinsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID15122047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.