ReviewIntensive care medicine2004
Safe paediatric intensive care. Part 2: workplace organisation, critical incident monitoring and guidelines.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary Cleft Palate Program at BC Children's Hospital: Are We Meeting the Standards of Care?Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2018Article
- Use of simulation-based medical training in Swiss pediatric hospitals: a national survey.BMC medical education · 2017Article
- Interprofessional team management in pediatric critical care: some challenges and possible solutions.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2016Review
- Clinical directors' views of centralisation and commissioning of cleft services in the U.K.BMC oral health · 2015Article
- Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score in Italy: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.Intensive care medicine · 2007Article
- [New perspectives for simulator-based training in paediatric anaesthesia and emergency medicine].Der Anaesthesist · 2006Review
- Set of Quality Indicators of Pediatric Intensive Care in Spain: Delphi Method Selection.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to optimise safety within the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), it is essential to optimise organisation, identify problem areas and implement standards and guidelines for safe practice (with appropriate monitoring). Organisational issues have a major impact on safety: the introduction and-recently-centralisation of paediatric intensive care, the appointment of dedicated paediatric intensivists, nursing staffing, handovers, rounds, the number of work hours and night shifts with the associated problems of disturbed circadian rhythms. The technique of voluntary, anonymous, non-punitive critical incident reporting has the potential to identify incidents and latent errors before they become self-evident through a major incident. This systems approach focuses on organisational and communication problems. Standards and guidelines may help in weighing up the benefits and risks of invasive procedures, and interventional studies have shown that implementation of standards and guidelines can improve outcome. Mortality prediction models enable us to monitor quality of care and, thus, to investigate the best ways of organising intensive care and monitoring the effects of changes in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15118817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.