ArticleAtencion primaria2004
[Information given to patients and their participation in clinical decision-making].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inappropriate Use of Medication by Elderly, Polymedicated, or Multipathological Patients with Chronic Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Pooled it
- Barriers for an effective communication around clinical decision making: an analysis of the gaps between doctors' and patients' point of view.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014Article
- [Influence of the patient's companion on the discussion and length of the clinical interview in primary health care].Atencion primaria · 2009Article
- [The patient's right to information: influence of socio-professional factors in primary care].Atencion primaria · 2006Article
- [On the perceived quality of primary care].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [Perceptions and expectations on primary health care: a new form of identifying improvements in the care system].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [Prescription medicines information: Spanish general population survey].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [By taking joint decisions, we will gain in effectiveness].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [Commentary: The challenge of patient information].Atencion primaria · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the information provided by physicians during consultations, the information requested by patients, and patients' participation in decision-making.
designDescriptive, cross-sectional study based on observations of visits to the doctor's office and subsequent telephone interview.
settingPrimary care centers in Toledo, Spain.Participants. 152 clinical interviews.Interventions. Questionnaire with items on age, sex, types of information provided by the physician, information requested by the patient, and evaluation of the patient's participation in decision-making and degree of satisfaction. MAIN MEASURES AND
resultsMean age of the patients was 41.1 years, and 55.9% were women. The type of information given most frequently to patients was related to treatment (88.3%). Of the 152 patients whose visits were observed, 55 (36.2%) did not request additional information. The information requested most frequently when not provided spontaneously by the physician concerned treatment (35.3%) and cause of the symptoms (29.7%). Almost all patients (94.0%) considered the information received to be sufficient. However, 22.7% stated that when they left the doctor's office there was something they wished they had asked about, and 18.6% said they understood the doctor's explanations "in part." According to the observers, 69.4% of the patients did not take part in the decision about their treatment.
conclusionsThe information provided by the physician was not as complete as it might have been. Patients usually ask few questions, and a large percentage of patients had something they wished they had asked about, or did not fully understand the information. Patients' participation in decision-making was low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15117629PMC7668772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.