Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15114435›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2004

Impaired set-shifting and dissociable effects on tests of spatial working memory following the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride in human volunteers.

Mitul A Mehta, Facundo F Manes, Gianna Magnolfi, Barbara J Sahakian, Trevor W Robbins

Abstract readClinical TrialControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Dopamine D2-receptor blockade enhances decoding of prefrontal signals in humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Dissociating distractor-filtering at encoding and during maintenance.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2014
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Dopamine depletion impairs frontostriatal functional connectivity during a set-shifting task.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Neuromodulation of prefrontal cortex cognitive function in primates: the powerful roles of monoamines and acetylcholine.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mitul A MehtaDepartment of Psychiatry, Level E4, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK. m.mehta@iop.kcl.ac.uk
Facundo F Manes
Gianna Magnolfi
Barbara J Sahakian
Trevor W Robbins
University of Cambridge · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDopamine (DA) D(2) receptor antagonists have been shown to produce similar impairments to those seen in Parkinson's disease. These include working memory and set-shifting deficits. Theories of DA function have predicted that distraction or impaired switching may be important determinants of such deficits.

objectivesIn order to test these hypotheses, we have followed up our previous findings with more refined tests (1) that allow measurement of spatial working memory (SWM) and distraction, (2) that allow separation of executive and mnemonic components of SWM and (3) that allow isolation of set-shifting from learning deficits.

methodsThirty-six young healthy male volunteers were tested on two occasions after oral administration of either 400 mg sulpiride or placebo. All participants performed the delayed response task. Sixteen participants received task-irrelevant distractors during this task, and were also given a self-ordered SWM test. The remaining participants were given delayed response tasks with task-relevant distractors, and tests of attentional and task set-shifting.

resultsSulpiride impaired performance of the delayed-response task both without distraction and with task-relevant distraction. By contrast, the drug protected against deficits from task-irrelevant distraction seen in the placebo group. Task set-switching was also impaired by sulpiride, with participants being slower to respond on switch trials compared with non-switch trials. There was also a trend for attentional set-shifting to be impaired following sulpiride. In contrast, self-ordered SWM performance was enhanced by sulpiride on the second test session only.

conclusionsThese results support models of central DA function that postulate a role in switching behaviour, and in certain aspects of working memory.

Indexed as

Dopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsAdultAffectAttentionCognitionDopamine AntagonistsFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSex CharacteristicsSpace PerceptionSulpirideDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsSulpiride

Identifiers

PMID15114435
OpenAlexW1969635251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.