Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15114419›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2004

Salmonid opsin sequences undergo positive selection and indicate an alternate evolutionary relationship in oncorhynchus.

Stephen G Dann, W Ted Allison, David B Levin, John S Taylor, Craig W Hawryshyn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen G DannDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3020 STN CSC, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 3N5.
W Ted Allison
David B Levin
John S Taylor
Craig W Hawryshyn
University of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive selection can be demonstrated by statistical analysis when non-synonymous nucleotide substitutions occur more frequently than synonymous substitutions (dN>dS). This pattern of sequence evolution has been observed in the rhodopsin gene of cichlids. Mutations in opsin genes resulting in amino acid (AA) replacement appear to be associated with the evolution of specific color patterns and the evolution of courtship behaviors. Within fish, AA replacements in opsin proteins have improved vision at great depths and have occurred in deep-sea species. Salmonids experience diverse photic environments during their life history. Furthermore, sexual selection has resulted in species-specific male and female coloration during spawning. To look for evidence of positive selection in salmonid opsins, we sequenced the RH1, RH2, LWS, SWS1, and SWS2 genes from six Pacific salmon species as well as the Atlantic salmon. These salmonids include landlocked and migratory species and species that vary in their coloration during spawning. In each opsin gene comparison from all species sampled, traditional dN:dS analysis did not indicate positive selection. However, the more sensitive Creevey-McInerney statistical analysis indicates that RH1 and RH2 experienced positive selection early in the evolution and speciation of salmonids.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSelection, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceCloning, MolecularDNA, ComplementaryDNA PrimersOncorhynchus mykissPhylogenyReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRod OpsinsDNA, ComplementaryDNA PrimersRod Opsins

Identifiers

PMID15114419
OpenAlexW2105703738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.