ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2004
Antibody response to influenza vaccination in splenectomized patients in Poland.
Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influenza vaccination for immunocompromised patients: systematic review and meta-analysis from a public health policy perspective.PloS one · 2011Pooled it
- Immunogenicity of Split Inactivated Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Adults with Obesity in the 2017/2018 Season.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
- Influenza diagnosis and vaccination in Poland.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2013Review
- Pulmonary infection with influenza A virus induces site-specific germinal center and T follicular helper cell responses.PloS one · 2012Article
- Review
- Pneumococcal and influenza immunization in asplenic persons: a retrospective population-based cohort study 1990-2002.BMC infectious diseases · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess antibody response in 62 splenectomized patients and in 55 healthy subjects vaccinated with split influenza vaccine ("Fluarix," SmithKline Beecham). Response to hemagglutinin and neuraminidase was assessed before vaccination and after 1 month by hemagglutination inhibition test and neuraminidase inhibition test. After vaccination, antibody titers significantly increased in both groups. Postvaccination protection rates ranged from 62.9 to 90.3% in the splenectomized patients and from 81.8 to 94.5% in the control group. Response rates ranged from 50.0 to 75.8% and from 60.0 to 70.9%, respectively. Splenectomized patients produced high antibody levels regardless of the time elapsed from the operation to the vaccination. All requirements of the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products regarding humoral response to influenza vaccination in healthy people were fulfilled in both groups. The response in the splenectomized patients was comparable to that in the control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.