SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2004
Systematic review of recent innovations in service provision to improve access to primary care.
Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- Task shifting in primary care to tackle healthcare worker shortages: An umbrella review.The European journal of general practice · 2021Pooled it
- Factors that influence family and parental preferences and decision making for unscheduled paediatric healthcare - systematic review.BMC health services research · 2020Pooled it
- Health service brokerage to improve primary care access for populations experiencing vulnerability or disadvantage: a systematic review and realist synthesis.BMC health services research · 2019Pooled it
- The quality, safety and governance of telephone triage and advice services - an overview of evidence from systematic reviews.BMC health services research · 2017Pooled it
- Telephone consultations for general practice: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions.BMC health services research · 2010Pooled it
- A Link Work Intervention to Facilitate Dental Visiting in People With Severe Mental Illness: A Two-Arm, Multi-Site, Assessor Blind, Randomised Feasibility Trial With Dental Record Linkage.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Article
- What's been tried: a curated catalogue of efforts to improve access to general practice.BJGP open · 2025Article
- Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Review
- Improving access to general practice for and with people with severe and multiple disadvantage: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Article
- A paradox of problems in accessing general practice: a qualitative participatory case study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Article
- Access to episodic primary care: a cross-sectional comparison of walk-in clinics and urgent primary care centers in British Columbia.Primary health care research & development · 2023Article
- Changes in consultation mode during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in Croatian family medicine: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Improving access to general practice for people with severe and multiple disadvantage: a realist review protocol (The Connection Study).Wellcome open research · 2023Article
- COVID-19 - an opportunity to improve access to primary care through organizational innovations? A qualitative multiple case study in Quebec and Nova Scotia (Canada).BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Providing Care by Telephone to Refugees and Asylum Seekers: An Evaluation of Telephone Mode-of-Care in Monash Health Refugee Health and Wellbeing Clinic in Victoria, Australia.Health services insights · 2022Article
- Interprofessional advanced access - a quality improvement protocol for expanding access to primary care services.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Characteristics of COVID-19-Related Free Telephone Consultations by Public Health Nurses in Japan: A Retrospective Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn England, there are particularly pressing problems concerning access to adequate primary care services. Consequently, innovative ways of delivering primary care have been introduced to facilitate and broaden access.
aimsThe aim of this study was to review the evidence of seven recent innovations in service provision to improve access or equity in access to primary care, by performing a systematic review of the literature. DESIGN OF STUDY: Systematic review.
settingPrimary care in the United Kingdom (UK).
methodSeven electronic databases were searched and key journals were hand-searched. Unpublished and 'grey' literature were sought via the Internet and through professional contacts. Intervention studies addressing one of seven recent innovations and conducted in the UK during the last 20 years were included. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of papers.
resultsThirty studies (32 papers and two reports) were identified overall. Variation in study design and outcome measures made comparisons difficult. However, there was some evidence to suggest that access is improved by changing the ways in which primary care is delivered. First-wave personal medical services pilots facilitated improvements in access to primary care in previously under-served areas and/or populations. Walk-in centres and NHS Direct have provided additional access to primary care for white middle-class patients; there is some evidence suggesting that these innovations have increased access inequalities. There is some evidence that telephone consultations with GPs or nurses can safely substitute face-to-face consultations, although it is not clear that this reduces the number of face-to-face consultations over time. Nurse practitioners and community pharmacists can manage common conditions without the patient consulting a general practitioner.
conclusionThe evidence is insufficient to make clear recommendations regarding ways to improve access to primary care. In the future, it is important that, as new initiatives are planned, well-designed evaluations are commissioned simultaneously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15113523PMC1266174W1956553728What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.