Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15113435›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2004

Validation of the diagnosis of autism in general practitioner records.

Eric Fombonne, Lisa Heavey, Liam Smeeth, Laura C Rodrigues, Claire Cook, Peter G Smith, Linyan Meng, Andrew J Hall

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Prior Diagnoses and Age of Diagnosis in Children Later Diagnosed with Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Validation of Autism Diagnosis and Clinical Data in the SPARK Cohort.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Is the Autism Boom Headed for Medicaid? Patterns in the Enrollment of Autistic Adults in Wisconsin Medicaid, 2008-2018.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Foster Care Involvement Among Medicaid-Enrolled Children with Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Service Needs Across the Lifespan for Individuals with Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: a case-control study using electronic records.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric FombonneMcGill University, Montreal Children's Hospital, 4018 St Catherine St West, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3Z 1P2. eric.fombonne@mcgill.ca
Lisa Heavey
Liam Smeeth
Laura C Rodrigues
Claire Cook
Peter G Smith
Linyan Meng
Andrew J Hall
University of London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMontreal Children's Hospital · CAPsychiatry Research Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G108/492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe report on the validity of the computerized diagnoses of autism in a large case-control study investigating the possible association between autism and the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine in the UK using the General Practitioner Research Database (GPRD). We examined anonymized copies of all relevant available clinical reports, including general practitioners' (GP) notes, consultant, speech therapy and educational psychologists reports, on 318 subjects born between 1973 and 1997 with a diagnosis of autism or a related disorder recorded in their electronic general practice record.

methodsData were abstracted to a case validation form allowing for the identification of developmental symptoms relevant to the diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs). Information on other background clinical and familial features was also abstracted. A subset of 50 notes was coded independently by 2 raters to derive reliability estimates for key clinical characteristics.

resultsFor 294 subjects (92.5%) the diagnosis of PDD was confirmed after review of the records. Of these, 180 subjects (61.2%) fulfilled criteria for autistic disorder. The mean age at first recording of a PDD diagnosis in the GPRD database was 6.3 years (SD = 4.6). Consistent with previous estimates, the proportion of subjects experiencing regression in the course of their development was 19%. Inter-rater reliability for the presence of a PDD diagnosis was good (kappa =.73), and agreement on clinical features such as regression, age of parental recognition of first symptoms, language delay and presence of epilepsy was also good (kappas ranging from.56 to 1.0).

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that the positive predictive value of a diagnosis of autism recorded in the GPRD is high.

Indexed as

Age of OnsetAlgorithmsAutistic DisorderCase-Control StudiesChild Development Disorders, PervasiveChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFamily PracticeFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID15113435
PMCPMC394332
OpenAlexW2132042550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.