Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15113403›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2004

Current limitations of SNP data from the public domain for studies of complex disorders: a test for ten candidate genes for obesity and osteoporosis.

Volodymyr Dvornyk, Ji-Rong Long, Dong-Hai Xiong, Peng-Yuan Liu, Lan-Juan Zhao, Hui Shen, Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Yong-Jun Liu, Sonia Rocha-Sanchez, Peng Xiao and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association analysis of estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms with cross-sectional geometry of the femoral neck in Caucasian nuclear families.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2005
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Volodymyr DvornykOsteoporosis Research Center and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Creighton University, 601 N, 30th St, Suite 6730, Omaha, NE 68131, USA. dvornyk@creighton.edu
Ji-Rong Long
Dong-Hai Xiong
Peng-Yuan Liu
Lan-Juan Zhao
Hui Shen
Yuan-Yuan Zhang
Yong-Jun Liu
Sonia Rocha-Sanchez
Peng Xiao
Robert R Recker
Hong-Wen Deng

Funding

CHARACTERIZATION OF DELETERIOUS GENOMIC MUTATIONSR01GM060402 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2000 to 2005
$889k
Genetic Basis of Osteoporotic Fractures and Bone MassK01AR002170 · NIAMS · CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2001 to 2005
$505k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR002170NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR02170-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060402NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM60402-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic SNP databases are frequently used to choose SNPs for candidate genes in the association and linkage studies of complex disorders. However, their utility for such studies of diseases with ethnic-dependent background has never been evaluated.

resultsTo estimate the accuracy and completeness of SNP public databases, we analyzed the allele frequencies of 41 SNPs in 10 candidate genes for obesity and/or osteoporosis in a large American-Caucasian sample (1,873 individuals from 405 nuclear families) by PCR-invader assay. We compared our results with those from the databases and other published studies. Of the 41 SNPs, 8 were monomorphic in our sample. Twelve were reported for the first time for Caucasians and the other 29 SNPs in our sample essentially confirmed the respective allele frequencies for Caucasians in the databases and previous studies. The comparison of our data with other ethnic groups showed significant differentiation between the three major world ethnic groups at some SNPs (Caucasians and Africans differed at 3 of the 18 shared SNPs, and Caucasians and Asians differed at 13 of the 22 shared SNPs). This genetic differentiation may have an important implication for studying the well-known ethnic differences in the prevalence of obesity and osteoporosis, and complex disorders in general.

conclusionA comparative analysis of the SNP data of the candidate genes obtained in the present study, as well as those retrieved from the public domain, suggests that the databases may currently have serious limitations for studying complex disorders with an ethnic-dependent background due to the incomplete and uneven representation of the candidate SNPs in the databases for the major ethnic groups. This conclusion attests to the imperative necessity of large-scale and accurate characterization of these SNPs in different ethnic groups.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidAsian PeopleBlack PeopleFamily HealthFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationGenotypeHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleObesityOsteoporosisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhite People

Identifiers

PMID15113403
PMCPMC395827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.