Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15108817›Full record

ArticleEvolution & development

Enlightenment of old ideas from new investigations: more questions regarding the evolution of bacteriogenic light organs in squids.

M K Nishiguchi, J E Lopez, S v Boletzky

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution & development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Vascular architecture in the bacteriogenic light organ ofInvertebrate biology : a quarterly journal of the American Microscopical Society and the Division of Invertebrate Zoology/ASZ · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Predictable transcriptome evolution in the convergent and complex bioluminescent organs of squid.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M K NishiguchiNew Mexico State University, Department of Biology, Box 30001, MSC 3AF, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA. nish@nmsu.edu
J E Lopez
S v Boletzky
New Mexico State University · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Translational Control in the Hepatitis C VirusS06GM008136 · NIGMS · NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY LAS CRUCES · PI KUEHN, GLENN D · 1989 to 2011
$23.2M
RISE PROGRAM AT NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITYR25GM061222 · NIGMS · NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY LAS CRUCES · PI HOUSTON, JESSICA PEREA, REDDI, LAKSHMI · 2000 to 2022
$21.3M
Selection of host specific genes in environmentally transmitted mutualismSC1AI081659 · NIAID · NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY LAS CRUCES · PI NISHIGUCHI, MICHELE KIYOKO · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NIAID NIH HHS SC1 AI081659NIGMS NIH HHS GM61222-01NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM061222NIGMS NIH HHS S06 GM008136NIGMS NIH HHS SO6-GM08136-26
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioluminescence is widespread among many different types of marine organisms. Metazoans contain two types of luminescence production, bacteriogenic (symbiotic with bacteria) or autogenic, via the production of a luminous secretion or the intrinsic properties of luminous cells. Several species in two families of squids, the Loliginidae and the Sepiolidae (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) harbor bacteriogenic light organs that are found central in the mantle cavity. These light organs are exceptional in function, that is, the morphology and the complexity suggests that the organ has evolved to enhance and direct light emission from bacteria that are harbored inside. Although light organs are widespread among taxa within the Sepiolidae, the origin and development of this important feature is not well studied. We compared light organ morphology from several closely related taxa within the Sepiolidae and combined molecular phylogenetic data using four loci (nuclear ribosomal 28S rRNA and the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and 12S and 16S rRNA) to determine whether this character was an ancestral trait repeatedly lost among both families or whether it evolved independently as an adaptation to the pelagic and benthic lifestyles. By comparing other closely related extant taxa that do not contain symbiotic light organs, we hypothesized that the ancestral state of sepiolid light organs most likely evolved from part of a separate accessory gland open to the environment that allowed colonization of bacteria to occur and further specialize in the eventual development of the modern light organ.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionLuminescent MeasurementsPhylogenySymbiosisAnimalsAnimal StructuresBase SequenceDecapodiformesDNA, MitochondrialDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalEmbryonic InductionHistological TechniquesMolecular Sequence DataMorphogenesisOceans and SeasDNA, MitochondrialDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID15108817
PMCPMC3374719
OpenAlexW2171570796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.