Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15107363›Full record

ReviewEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2004

Secondary transport of the critically ill and injured adult.

A Gray, S Bush, S Whiteley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. It is (not) always on Friday: inter-hospital patient transfers in orthopedic and trauma surgery.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  9. Transferring the critically ill patient: are we there yet?Critical care (London, England) · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Critical care in the emergency department: patient transfer.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2007
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A GrayEmergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Alasdair.Gray@luht.scot.nhs.uk <Alasdair.Gray@luht.scot.nhs.uk>
S Bush
S Whiteley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is significant interest in the secondary transport of the critically ill and injured. High profile cases entailing the long distance transfer of patients have highlighted the lack of availability of critical care beds and appropriate systems for transferring this patient group. These and other issues have culminated in the release of Comprehensive Critical Care by the Department of Health in 2000. It has been shown that a large number of critical care transfers originate in the emergency department. The transportation of patients has not traditionally been part of the core curriculum of emergency medicine specialists in the UK. It is imperative that clinicians have an understanding of the issues surrounding transportation of the critically ill and injured. This should include appreciation of the local and regional organisational frameworks implemented for this patient group. This review describes the core issues relevant to emergency medicine relating to the transportation of the critically ill and injured.

Indexed as

AdultCritical CareCritical IllnessEmergency MedicineHumansPatient TransferWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID15107363
PMCPMC1726322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.