SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Day three versus day two embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and Safety of Two Consecutive Cycles of Single Embryo Transfer Compared With One Cycle of Double Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- Interventions for the prevention of OHSS in ART cycles: an overview of Cochrane reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Association Between Pregnancy Outcomes and the Time of Progesterone Exposure of D6 Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Frozen-Thawed Cycles: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2024Article
- Efficacy of Artificial Oocyte Activation in Improving the Reproductive Outcome in Poor Responders: A Single Centre Cohort Study.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2023Article
- Efficacy of embryo transfer on day 2 versus day 3 according to maternal age in patients with normal ovarian response.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2017Article
- Vitrification of day 3 cleavage-stage embryos yields better clinical outcome in comparison with vitrification of day 2 cleavage-stage embryos.Zygote (Cambridge, England) · 2015Article
- Embryo transfer in days 2 to 4 following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective cohort study.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2015Article
- A study of recipient related predictors of success in oocyte donation program.Journal of human reproductive sciences · 2012Article
- Perinatal morbidity after in vitro fertilization is lower with frozen embryo transfer.Fertility and sterility · 2011Article
- Extended in vitro maturation of immature oocytes from stimulated cycles: an analysis of fertilization potential, embryo development, and reproductive outcomes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmbryo transfer (ET) was traditionally performed two days after oocyte retrieval; however, developments in culture media have allowed embryos to be maintained in culture for longer periods. Delaying transfer from day two to day three would allow for further development of the embryo and might have a positive effect on pregnancy outcomes.
objectivesTo determine if there is any difference in live birth and pregnancy rates when ET is performed on day three, compared with day two, in infertile couples undergoing treatment with in vitro fertilization (IVF), including intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders & Subfertility Group trials register (17th December 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2003) and Biological Abstracts Databases (1980 to 2003), the National Research Register (NRR), the Medical Research Council's Clinical Trials Register, the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, citation lists of relevant publications, review articles and included studies, as well as abstracts of appropriate scientific meetings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that compared day three versus day two embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval during an IVF or ICSI treatment cycle in subfertile couples. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. The primary outcome measures were live birth rate and ongoing pregnancy rate. MAIN
resultsTen studies involving 2027 women were included, but only three studies reported live birth and four reported ongoing pregnancy rates. The pooled odds ratios (day three compared to day two) were 1.07, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.37 for live birth and 1.05, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.32 for ongoing pregnancy. From ten studies, the pooled odds ratio for clinical pregnancy was 1.26, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.51. Sub-group analysis revealed that this advantage occurred in those undergoing ICSI cycles. A higher miscarriage rate with day 3 ET in ICSI cycles works to negate the increased clinical pregnancy rate, in agreement with the finding of no significant difference between treatments in live birth rate. REVIEWERS'
conclusionsAlthough an increase in clinical pregnancy rate with day three embryo transfer was demonstrated, at present there is not sufficient good quality evidence to suggest an improvement in live birth when embryo transfer is delayed from day two to day three.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.