Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15106246›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Treatment for swallowing difficulties (dysphagia) in chronic muscle disease.

M Hill, T Hughes, C Milford

RetractedAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for dysphagia in long-term, progressive muscle disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Treatment for dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) in hereditary ataxia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Restriction of oral intake of water for aspiration lung disease in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Pulmonary Involvement in Neuromuscular Diseases: A Review.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Treatment for inclusion body myositis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M HillInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, Frenchay Hospital, Frenchay Park Road, Bristol, UK, BS16 1LE.
T Hughes
C Milford
Parkwood Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), a common complication of long-term progressive muscle disease in children and adults, is currently unclear.

objectivesOur objective was to determine the most appropriate intervention for dysphagia in people with chronic, untreatable, non-inflammatory muscle disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (from January 1966 to Week 2 June 2003), EMBASE (from January 1980 to Week 2 June 2003), AMED (from January 1985 to Week 2 June 2003), LILACS (from January 1982 to June 21 2003) and CINAHL (from January 1982 to Week 2 June 2003) and contacted authors of published studies and other experts. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of adults and children with chronic untreatable non-inflammatory muscle disease. The interventions under review included dietary modification, swallowing manoeuvres, a range of surgical interventions and enteral feeding. Our primary outcome was stabilisation of previously documented progressive weight loss not attributable to any other cause or weight gain of at least 5 kg in adults or increase in weight to at least the 10th centile in children, maintained for at least six months following the intervention. Secondary outcomes were: reduction in laryngeal penetration of bolus and/or aspiration observed on videofluoroscopy (modified barium swallow), reduction in chest infections attributable to aspiration over a six-month period, improvement in quality of life using a validated rating scale, the proportion of subjects who refused the intervention, the proportion of carers who refused the intervention, and serious adverse events related to the intervention within the first twelve months after intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified no randomised controlled trials. We identified seven case series reporting the results of surgical intervention for moderate to severe dysphagia, and one reporting on the outcome of feeding advice and enteral feeding in children with a congenital myopathy. MAIN

resultsNo studies were found that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Therefore it was not possible to determine the benefit or otherwise of surgical intervention (cricopharyngeal myotomy or upper oesophageal dilatation) for oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy or other chronic progressive muscle diseases, and dietary advice or enteral feeding for children with congenital myopathy, compared with no intervention or an alternative intervention. REVIEWERS'

conclusionsThere are no trials that have adequately evaluated treatments in the management of dysphagia for chronic muscle disease. It is therefore not possible to decide on the most appropriate treatment for a given individual based on current evidence.

Indexed as

AdultChildChronic DiseaseDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersHumansMuscular Diseases

Identifiers

PMID15106246
OpenAlexW1752835584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.