Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15106216›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Tramadol for neuropathic pain.

R M Duhmke, D D Cornblath, J R F Hollingshead

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05311774 (Efficacy of Duloxetine in Conjunction With Tramadol for Chronic Cancer Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05311774 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Duloxetine in Conjunction With Tramadol for Chronic Cancer Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled400ConditionsCancer PainArmsDuloxetine 30 mg, Tramadol, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tramadol for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. TheTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. [Pain management of burn injuries].Der Anaesthesist · 2011
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Opioids for managing chronic non-malignant pain: safe and effective prescribing.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2006
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R M Duhmke
D D Cornblath
J R F Hollingshead
Johns Hopkins Hospital · USPapworth Hospital · GBRoyal Sussex County Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuropathic pain syndrome consists of a group of symptoms, including burning or shooting sensations, abnormal sensitivity to normally painless stimuli, or a greatly raised sensitivity to painful stimuli. A wide range of disorders can cause neuropathic pain, nerve damage being the only common factor.

objectivesWe aimed to review systematically the evidence from randomised controlled trials for the efficacy of tramadol in treating neuropathic pain. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials register (July 2002), MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2002), EMBASE (January 1980 to July 2002), and LILACS (January 1982 to July 2002) for randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials. We also searched bibliographies of published trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing tramadol with placebo, other pain relieving treatment, or no treatment in people of both sexes and all ages with neuropathic pain of all degrees of severity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers extracted data and scored trial quality. We calculated relative risks and numbers needed to treat for effectiveness and adverse effects. MAIN

resultsWe identified five eligible trials, three comparing tramadol with placebo, one comparing tramadol with clomipramine, and one comparing tramadol with morphine. All three trials comparing tramadol with placebo showed a significant reduction in neuropathic pain with tramadol. Two of the trials that compared tramadol to placebo (total 161 participants) were combined in a meta-analysis. The number needed to treat with tramadol compared to placebo to reach at least 50% pain relief was 3.5 (95% confidence interval 2.4 to 5.9). There were insufficient data to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of tramadol compared to either clomipramine or morphine. Only one trial considered subcategories of neuropathic pain. It found a significant therapeutic effect of tramadol on paraesthesiae, allodynia, and touch-evoked pain. Numbers needed to harm were calculated for side effects resulting in withdrawal from the placebo-controlled trials. Two trials provided these data, and the combined number needed to harm was 7.7 (95% confidence interval 4.6 to 20). REVIEWERS'

conclusionsTramadol is an effective treatment for neuropathic pain.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidClomipramineHumansMorphineNervous System DiseasesPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTramadolAnalgesics, OpioidClomipramineMorphineSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTramadol

Identifiers

PMID15106216
OpenAlexW4245389462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.