Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15106198›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Interventions for impetigo.

S Koning, A P Verhagen, L W A van Suijlekom-Smit, A Morris, C C Butler, J C van der Wouden

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for impetigo.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. NVC-422 topical gel for the treatment of impetigo.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2011
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Skin conditions of baseball, cricket, and softball players.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Skin infections and antibiotic prescribing: a comparison of surveillance and prescribing data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
  13. Article
  14. [Antibacterial photodynamic therapy. A new treatment for superficial bacterial infections?].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2005
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Treatment for impetigo.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004
    Article
  17. Common skin infections in children.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004
    Review
  18. Topical Antibacterials in Dermatology.Indian journal of dermatology
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S KoningDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Room Ff337, PO Box 1738, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3000 DR.
A P Verhagen
L W A van Suijlekom-Smit
A Morris
C C Butler
J C van der Wouden
Erasmus MC · NLCardiff University · GBErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpetigo is a common superficial bacterial skin infection, most frequently encountered in children. There is no standard therapy and guidelines for treatment differ widely. Treatment options include many different oral and topical antibiotics as well as disinfectants.

objectivesTo assess the effects of treatments for impetigo, including waiting for natural resolution. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Skin Group Specialised Trials Register (March 2002), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 1 2002), the National Research Register (2002), MEDLINE (from 1966 to January 2003), EMBASE (from 1980 to March 2000) and LILACS (November 2001). We handsearched the Yearbook of Dermatology (1938-1966), the Yearbook of Drug Therapy (1949-1966), used reference lists of articles and contacted pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of treatments for non-bullous and bullous, primary and secondary impetigo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All steps in data collection were done by two independent reviewers. We performed quality assessments and data collection in two separate stages. MAIN

resultsWe included 57 trials including 3533 participants in total which studied 20 different oral and 18 different topical treatments. CURE OR IMPROVEMENT: Topical antibiotics showed better cure rates than placebo (pooled odds ratio (OR) 6.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.93 to 10.73), and no topical antibiotic was superior (pooled OR of mupirocin versus fusidic acid 1.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.16). Topical mupirocin was superior to oral erythromycin (pooled OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.97). In most other comparisons, topical and oral antibiotics did not show significantly different cure rates, nor did most trials comparing oral antibiotics. Penicillin was inferior to erythromycin and cloxacillin and there is little evidence that using disinfectant solutions improves impetigo. SIDE EFFECTS: The reported number of side effects was low. Oral antibiotic treatment caused more side effects, especially gastrointestinal ones, than topical treatment. REVIEWERS'

conclusionsData on the natural course of impetigo are lacking. Placebo controlled trials are scarce. There is little evidence about the value of disinfecting measures. There is good evidence that topical mupirocin and topical fusidic acid are equally, or more effective than oral treatment for people with limited disease. It is unclear if oral antibiotics are superior to topical antibiotics for people with extensive impetigo. Fusidic acid and mupirocin are of similar efficacy. Penicillin was not as effective as most other antibiotics. Resistance patterns against antibiotics change and should be taken into account in the choice of therapy.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdministration, TopicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansImpetigoRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID15106198
OpenAlexW1737584440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.