SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Interventions for impetigo.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for impetigo.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Whole genome sequencing reveals extensive community-level transmission of group A Streptococcus in remote communities.Epidemiology and infection · 2016Trial
- NVC-422 topical gel for the treatment of impetigo.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2011Trial
- Progress in topical nanoformulations against bacterial skin and soft tissue infections- current trends.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Review
- The global, regional, and national patterns of change in the burden of bacterial pyoderma from 1990 to 2019 and the forecast for the next decade.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Protocol for the systematic review of the prevention, treatment and public health management of impetigo, scabies and fungal skin infections in resource-limited settings.Systematic reviews · 2016Article
- Article
- Skin conditions of baseball, cricket, and softball players.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2013Review
- Modelling of the outcome of non-inferiority trials by integration of historical data.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2011Article
- Increasing hospitalizations and general practice prescriptions for community-onset staphylococcal disease, England.Emerging infectious diseases · 2008Article
- Review
- Skin infections and antibiotic prescribing: a comparison of surveillance and prescribing data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007Article
- Characterization of the epidemic European fusidic acid-resistant impetigo clone of Staphylococcus aureus.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2007Article
- [Antibacterial photodynamic therapy. A new treatment for superficial bacterial infections?].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2005Review
- A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.BMC medical research methodology · 2005Article
- Treatment for impetigo.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Article
- Common skin infections in children.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Review
- Topical Antibacterials in Dermatology.Indian journal of dermatologyReview
- National athletic trainers' association position statement: skin diseases.Journal of athletic trainingReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImpetigo is a common superficial bacterial skin infection, most frequently encountered in children. There is no standard therapy and guidelines for treatment differ widely. Treatment options include many different oral and topical antibiotics as well as disinfectants.
objectivesTo assess the effects of treatments for impetigo, including waiting for natural resolution. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Skin Group Specialised Trials Register (March 2002), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 1 2002), the National Research Register (2002), MEDLINE (from 1966 to January 2003), EMBASE (from 1980 to March 2000) and LILACS (November 2001). We handsearched the Yearbook of Dermatology (1938-1966), the Yearbook of Drug Therapy (1949-1966), used reference lists of articles and contacted pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of treatments for non-bullous and bullous, primary and secondary impetigo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All steps in data collection were done by two independent reviewers. We performed quality assessments and data collection in two separate stages. MAIN
resultsWe included 57 trials including 3533 participants in total which studied 20 different oral and 18 different topical treatments. CURE OR IMPROVEMENT: Topical antibiotics showed better cure rates than placebo (pooled odds ratio (OR) 6.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.93 to 10.73), and no topical antibiotic was superior (pooled OR of mupirocin versus fusidic acid 1.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.16). Topical mupirocin was superior to oral erythromycin (pooled OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.97). In most other comparisons, topical and oral antibiotics did not show significantly different cure rates, nor did most trials comparing oral antibiotics. Penicillin was inferior to erythromycin and cloxacillin and there is little evidence that using disinfectant solutions improves impetigo. SIDE EFFECTS: The reported number of side effects was low. Oral antibiotic treatment caused more side effects, especially gastrointestinal ones, than topical treatment. REVIEWERS'
conclusionsData on the natural course of impetigo are lacking. Placebo controlled trials are scarce. There is little evidence about the value of disinfecting measures. There is good evidence that topical mupirocin and topical fusidic acid are equally, or more effective than oral treatment for people with limited disease. It is unclear if oral antibiotics are superior to topical antibiotics for people with extensive impetigo. Fusidic acid and mupirocin are of similar efficacy. Penicillin was not as effective as most other antibiotics. Resistance patterns against antibiotics change and should be taken into account in the choice of therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.