SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delivery arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2014Pooled it
- User-held personalised information for routine care of people with severe mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- The Maternal and Child Health (MCH) handbook in Mongolia: a cluster-randomized, controlled trial.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Effect of a maternal and child health handbook on maternal knowledge and behaviour: a community-based controlled trial in rural Cambodia.Health policy and planning · 2015Article
- Data re-entry overload: time for a paradigm shift in maternity IT?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2011Review
- Patient-Held Maternal and/or Child Health Records: Meeting the Information Needs of Patients and Healthcare Providers in Developing Countries?Online journal of public health informatics · 2011Article
- Self-management for people with inflammatory bowel disease.Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2008Review
- Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn many countries women are given their own case notes to carry during pregnancy so as to increase their sense of control and satisfaction with their care.
objectivesTo evaluate the effects of giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (January 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of women given their own case notes to carry during pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria and assessed study quality. One reviewer extracted data from the included studies using a standard form (checked by second reviewer). We assessed estimates of effect using relative risk with 95% confidence intervals. MAIN
resultsThree trials were included (n = 675 women). Women carrying their own notes were more likely to feel in control (relative risk (RR) 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18 to 2.06). Women's satisfaction: one trial reported more women in the case notes group (66/95) were satisfied with their care than the control group (58/102) (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.52); two trials reported no difference in women's satisfaction (one trial provided no data and one trial used a 17 point satisfaction scale). More women in the case notes group wanted to carry their own notes in a subsequent pregnancy (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.24). Overall, the pooled estimate of the two trials (n = 347) that reported on the risk of notes lost or left at home was not significant (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.84). There was no difference for health related behaviours (cigarette smoking and breastfeeding), analgesia needs during labour, miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal deaths. More women in the case notes group had operative deliveries (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.12). REVIEWERS'
conclusionsThe three trials are small, and not all of them reported on all outcomes. The results suggest that there are both potential benefits (increased maternal control and satisfaction during pregnancy, increased availability of antenatal records during hospital attendance) and harms (more operative deliveries). Importantly, all of the trials report that more women in the case notes group would prefer to hold their antenatal records in another pregnancy. There is insufficient evidence on health related behaviours (smoking and breastfeeding) and clinical outcomes. It is important to emphasise that this review shows a lack of evidence of benefit rather than evidence of no benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.