Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15105656›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2004

Recurrent hepatitis C in liver allografts: prospective assessment of diagnostic accuracy, identification of pitfalls, and observations about pathogenesis.

A J Demetris, B Eghtesad, A Marcos, K Ruppert, M A Nalesnik, P Randhawa, T Wu, A Krasinskas, P Fontes, T Cacciarelli and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Immunosuppression for liver transplantation in HCV-infected patients: mechanism-based principles.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

A J DemetrisDepartment of Pathology, Division of Transplantation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. demetrisaj@upmc.edu
B Eghtesad
A Marcos
K Ruppert
M A Nalesnik
P Randhawa
T Wu
A Krasinskas
P Fontes
T Cacciarelli
A O Shakil
N Murase
J J Fung
T E Starzl

Funding

INTERLEUKIN 6 AND HUMAN BILIARY EPITHELIAL PROLIFERATIONR01DK049615 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DEMETRIS, ANTHONY J · 1996 to 2006
$1.4M
ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATIONR01DK029961 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STARZL, THOMAS E · 1986 to 2001
$876k
NIAID NIH HHS AI38899NIDDK NIH HHS DK49615NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK029961NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK049615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

designThe accuracy of a prospective histopathologic diagnosis of rejection and recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) was determined in 48 HCV RNA-positive liver allograft recipients enrolled in an "immunosuppression minimization protocol" between July 29, 2001 and January 24, 2003. Prospective entry of all pertinent treatment, laboratory, and histopathology results into an electronic database enabled a retrospective analysis of the accuracy of histopathologic diagnoses and the pathophysiologic relationship between recurrent HCV and rejection.

resultsTime to first onset of acute rejection (AR) (mean, 107 days; median, 83 days; range, 7-329 days) overlapped with the time to first onset of recurrent HCV (mean, 115 days; median, 123 days; range, 22-315 days), making distinction between the two difficult. AR and chronic rejection (CR) with and without co-existent HCV showed overlapping but significantly different liver injury test profiles. One major and two minor errors occurred (positive predictive values for AR = 91%; recurrent HCV = 100%); all involved an overdiagnosis of AR in the context of recurrent HCV. Retrospective analysis of the mistakes showed that major errors can be avoided altogether and the impact of unavoidable minor errors can be minimized by strict adherence to specific histopathologic criteria, close clinicopathologic correlation including examination of HCV RNA levels, and a conservative approach to the use of additional immunosuppression. In addition, histopathologic diagnoses of moderate and severe AR and CR were associated with relatively low HCV RNA levels, whereas relatively high HCV RNA levels were associated with a histopathologic diagnosis of hepatitis alone, particularly the cholestatic variant of HCV.

conclusionsLiver allograft biopsy interpretation can rapidly and accurately distinguish between recurrent HCV and AR/CR. In addition, the histopathologic observations suggest that the immune mechanism responsible for HCV clearance overlap with those leading to significant rejection.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationAcute DiseaseAdultAgedBiopsyChronic DiseaseFemaleGraft RejectionHepacivirusHepatitis CHumansImmunocompromised HostImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsImmunosuppressive AgentsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID15105656
PMCPMC2974275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.