ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1992
Therapy of experimental meningitis due to Salmonella enteritidis.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bacteriological and molecular study ofVeterinary world · 2020Article
- Salmonella Meningitis Associated with Monocyte Infiltration in Mice.The American journal of pathology · 2017Article
- Salmonella meningitis in an adult with type B viral hepatitis and an incidental schwannoma.BMJ case reports · 2009Article
- Oral infection of mice with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium causes meningitis and infection of the brain.BMC infectious diseases · 2007Article
- Extended-spectrum-cephalosporin resistance in Salmonella enterica isolates of animal origin.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2004Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In many areas of the developing world, Salmonella spp. account for greater than 50% of the gram-negative enteric organisms isolated from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The response of Salmonella meningitis to conventional therapy (chloramphenicol and/or ampicillin) is slow, complications arise frequently, and mortality rates of 60 to 80% are common. Two newer agents, ceftriaxone and imipenem, were compared with ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in the therapy of experimental Salmonella meningitis beginning 14 h after intracisternal inoculation and continued by constant intravenous infusion for 8 h. Drug concentrations in serum and CSF closely approximated those achieved in the sera and CSF of humans receiving standard parenteral regimens. Penetration into purulent CSF [(concentration of drug in CSF/concentration of drug in serum) x 100] ranged from 18 to 41%. The rate of bacterial killing in CSF was significantly (P less than 0.001) more rapid during therapy with ceftriaxone and imipenem than it was during therapy with chloramphenicol or TMP-SMX. Ceftriaxone and imipenem sterilized the CSF of six of seven animals at 8 h, whereas it sterilized the CSF of three of eight animals treated with ampicillin (P = 0.18), one of eight animals treated with chloramphenicol, and none of seven animals treated with TMP-SMX (P less than or equal to 0.01; ceftriaxone or imipenem versus chloramphenicol or TMP-SMX). New beta-lactams, including ceftriaxone and imipenem, appear to be effective therapy against Salmonella spp. in this animal model and deserve further evaluation in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.