Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15103875›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2003

A qualitative study of barriers to the use of statins and the implementation of coronary heart disease prevention in primary care.

John Kedward, Lorraine Dakin

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment on statin prescribing: a descriptive study in English primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Improving long-term adherence to statin therapy: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Why are statin prescribing guidelines for primary prevention not always followed in primary care?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John KedwardThe Health Centre, 84-86 London Road, Bedford, Bedfordshire MK42 0NT. john@jkedward.freeserve.co.uk
Lorraine Dakin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatin prescribing to prevent coronary heart disease is well below recommended levels. Studies suggest that the prescribing behaviour of doctors may be the biggest factor in the wide variation in statin prescribing in general practice. Understanding doctors' perceptions offers some insight into why variation occurs.

aimTo understand general practitioners' (GPs') views about barriers to statin prescribing, statin prescribing guidelines, and the successes and barriers to coronary prevention in primary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews.

settingGeneral practices in mid and south Bedfordshire.

methodInterviews with 26 GPs.

resultsGPs spoke of a variety of barriers to initiating statin treatment specifically, and coronary heart disease prevention generally. Barriers to statin prescribing included: concerns about cost; increased workload and adherence to treatment; variation in treatment targets for lowering cholesterol; and concerns about medicalisation, lifestyle, and health behaviour. GPs found it difficult to prioritize patients for statin treatment, their statin treatment targets varied, and many found primary prevention risk assessment tools difficult to interpret. Coronary prevention was limited by practice space and organisational issues, by problems with recording and retrieval of electronic data, and by limited doctor and nurse time. GPs suggested that funded nurse time, nurse-led heart disease clinics, and better use of electronic data would improve primary care coronary prevention.

conclusionThere are complex barriers to statin prescribing and coronary prevention in general practice, which may explain some of the variation that exists. Further studies of patients' views of statins may provide more information. More resources, improved guidance, and better dissemination of guidance may only address some of the issues.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCoronary DiseaseFamily PracticeFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID15103875
PMCPMC1314690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.