ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2004
Chloride channel blockers activate an endogenous cationic current in oocytes of Bufo arenarum.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A two-electrode, voltage-clamp technique was used to measure the effect of the Cl(-) channel blockers, 9-anthracene carboxylic acid and niflumic acid, upon the ionic currents of oocytes of the South American toad Bufo arenarum. The main results were: (1) both blockers produced a reversible increase of the outward currents on a dose-dependent manner; (2) the activated outward current was voltage dependent; (3) the 9-anthracene carboxylic acid-sensitive current was blocked with barium; and (4) the effect of 9-anthracene carboxylic acid was more pronounced in a zero-K(+) solution than in standard (2 mmol l(-1)) or high (20 mmol l(-1)) K(+) solutions, indicating that a K(+) conductance is activated. The effect of the Cl(-) channel blockers could be due to a direct interaction with endogenous cationic channels. Another possible explanation is that Cl(-) that enter the cell during depolarizing steps in control solution inhibit this cationic conductance; thus, the blockade of Cl(-) channels by 9-anthracene carboxylic acid and niflumic acid would remove this inhibition, allowing the cationic current to flow freely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.