ReviewArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2004
Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature.
Review in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2018Pooled it
- Facilitators and barriers to implementing and sustaining facility-based stillbirth reviews in India: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Changing patterns of infant death over the last 100 years: autopsy experience from a specialist children's hospital.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2012Article
- Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of neonatologists and pathologists.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2004Article
- Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of bereaved parents.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perinatal postmortem rates are declining world wide. In the United Kingdom, perinatal pathology has recently been seriously undermined by controversy. There are important consequences for perinatal trials that include pathology studies. This review looks at the reasons for the decline in perinatal postmortem examinations and the effects on research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.