Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15102444›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2004

Catabolite activator protein: DNA binding and transcription activation.

Catherine L Lawson, David Swigon, Katsuhiko S Murakami, Seth A Darst, Helen M Berman, Richard H Ebright

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 326 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Actuation of CRP activating region 3 by formylation modulates theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transcription activation inEcoSal Plus · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comprehensive Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. DNA looping mediates cooperative transcription activation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Protein-Protein Interaction: Bacterial Two Hybrid.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine L LawsonDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, 610 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. cathy.lawson@rutgers.edu
David Swigon
Katsuhiko S Murakami
Seth A Darst
Helen M Berman
Richard H Ebright
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USPennsylvania State University · USRockefeller University · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATION BY CAPR01GM041376 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI RICHARD H. EBRIGHT · 1989 to 2026
$6.5M
BACTERIAL TRANSCRIPTION COMPLEXESR37GM041376 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI EBRIGHT, RICHARD H. · 2013 to 2022
$5.0M
THEORETICFAL ASPECTS OF DNA SUPERCOILINGR01GM034809 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI OLSON, WILMA K · 1985 to 2019
$4.6M
NUCLEIC ACID STRUCTURES AND INTERACTIONSR01GM021589 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI LAWSON, CATHERINE L · 1985 to 2009
$2.7M
MODELS OF SUPRAMOLECULAR TRANSCRIPTIONAL ASSEMBLIESP20GM064375 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI LEVY, RONALD · 2001 to 2003
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM21589NIGMS NIH HHS GM34809NIGMS NIH HHS GM41376NIGMS NIH HHS GM64375NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM064375NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM021589NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM034809NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM041376NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM041376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently determined structures of the Escherichia coli catabolite activator protein (CAP) in complex with DNA, and in complex with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain (alphaCTD) and DNA, have yielded insights into how CAP binds DNA and activates transcription. Comparison of multiple structures of CAP-DNA complexes has revealed the contributions of direct and indirect readout to DNA binding by CAP. The structure of the CAP-alphaCTD-DNA complex has provided the first structural description of interactions between a transcription activator and its functional target within the general transcription machinery. Using the structure of the CAP-alphaCTD-DNA complex, the structure of an RNA polymerase-DNA complex, and restraints from biophysical, biochemical and genetic experiments, it has been possible to construct detailed three-dimensional models of intact class I and class II transcription activation complexes.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularCyclic AMP Receptor ProteinDNADNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliModels, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticStructure-Activity RelationshipTranscriptional ActivationCyclic AMP Receptor ProteinDNADNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRNA polymerase alpha subunit

Identifiers

PMID15102444
PMCPMC2765107
OpenAlexW1989075680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.