ReviewDrugs2004
Antifungals in systemic neonatal candidiasis.
Review in Drugs, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prophylactic oral/topical non-absorbed antifungal agents to prevent invasive fungal infection in very low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Micafungin in premature and non-premature infants: a systematic review of 9 clinical trials.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2014Pooled it
- Antifungal therapy for newborn infants with invasive fungal infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Population pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B lipid complex in neonates.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2005Trial
- Population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole for prevention or treatment of invasive candidiasis in Chinese young infants.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Article
- Antibiotic Loaded Phytosomes as a Way to Develop Innovative Lipid Formulations of Polyene Macrolides.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Antifungal Drugs for Invasive Candida Infections (ICI) in Neonates: Future Perspectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
- Advances in the treatment of invasive neonatal candidiasis.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2015Review
- Fluconazole dosing for the prevention or treatment of invasive candidiasis in young infants.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2009Article
- Nosocomial or hospital-acquired infections: an overview.Disease-a-month : DM · 2009Review
- Review
- Micafungin: a review of its use in the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive Candida infections in pediatric patients.Paediatric drugs · 2009Review
- Antifungal agents in neonates: issues and recommendations.Paediatric drugs · 2007Review
- Drug discovery from natural sources.The AAPS journal · 2006Article
- Management of neonatal candidiasis. Neonatal Candidiasis Study Group.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungal infections are common in the newborn period, especially among premature neonates, and are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality. Currently, three classes of antifungals are commonly used in the treatment of systemic fungal infections in neonates: the polyene macrolides (e.g. amphotericin B [deoxycholate and lipid preparations]); the azoles (e.g. fluconazole); and the fluorinated pyrimidines (e.g. flucytosine). The echinocandins (e.g. caspofungin and micafungin) are a newer class of antifungals which shows promise in this population.The available kinetic data on amphotericin B deoxycholate in neonates are derived from very small studies and exhibit considerable variability. There are no kinetic data available for the use of lipid preparations in this population and, again, much has been inferred from adult studies. The information available for flucytosine is also limited but appears similar to what is observed in adults. Fluconazole has the most neonatal pharmacokinetic data, which show slightly less variability than the other antifungals. Genomic factors which affect the metabolism of amphotericin B and fluconazole may explain some of the observed variability. Most of the data for the efficacy of antifungal drugs in neonates are derived from retrospective studies and case reports. The data for amphotericin B deoxycholate and flucytosine are limited. There are more data for the liposomal and lipid complex preparations of amphotericin B and for fluconazole in this population. These support the use of these drugs in neonates, but because of their largely noncomparative nature they can not define the optimal dosage or duration of therapy. Amphotericin B deoxycholate is primarily nephrotoxic. It also induces electrolyte abnormalities and is to a lesser degree cardiotoxic. This toxicity in neonates appears similar to published data in older children and adults. While the lipid preparations of amphotericin B owe their existence to a presumed decrease in toxicity, the observed toxicity in neonates appears to be equal to that seen with the deoxycholate, although it should be noted that the lipid preparations are usually given at much higher dosages. Fluconazole toxicity appears to be milder and less frequent in this population than is seen with amphotericin B. In the final analysis, we do not have sufficient data to define the pharmacokinetic profiles, optimal dose or duration of therapy, or toxicity for any of these compounds in neonates. Further studies are necessary if the optimisation of antifungal therapy in this population is to continue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.