Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15100337›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2004

Effectiveness of implementing the agency for healthcare research and quality smoking cessation clinical practice guideline: a randomized, controlled trial.

David A Katz, Donna R Muehlenbruch, Roger L Brown, Michael C Fiore, Timothy B Baker, AHRQ Smoking Cessation Guideline Study Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. System change interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. A randomized trial of a multicomponent cessation strategy for emergency department smokers.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2011
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Ultrasound feedback and motivational interviewing targeting smoking cessation in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2009
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David A KatzDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.
Donna R Muehlenbruch
Roger L Brown
Michael C Fiore
Timothy B Baker
AHRQ Smoking Cessation Guideline Study Group
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

PREVENTIVE ONCOLOGY ACADEMIC AWARDK07CA078540 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI KATZ, DAVID A · 1998 to 2002
$263k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA078540NCI NIH HHS K07-CA78540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Smoking Cessation Clinical Practice Guideline recommends that all clinicians strongly advise their patients who use tobacco to quit.

methodsWe conducted a randomized, controlled trial of the effectiveness of Guideline implementation at eight community-based primary care clinics in southern Wisconsin (four test sites, four control sites) among 2163 consecutively enrolled adult patients who smoked at least one cigarette per day and presented for nonemergency care during the baseline period (June 16, 1999, to June 20, 2000) or the intervention period (from June 21, 2000, to May 3, 2001). After collecting baseline data, staff at test sites implemented the intervention over a 2-month period. The intervention included a tutorial for intake clinicians, group and individual performance feedback for intake clinicians, use of a modified vital signs stamp, an offer of free nicotine replacement therapy, and proactive telephone counseling. Staff at control sites received only general information about the AHRQ Guideline. Self-reported abstinence from smoking was determined by telephone interviews at 2- and 6-month follow-up assessments. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for treatment assignment after adjustment for patient characteristics. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in smoking cessation rates between participants at test and control sites during the baseline period. Among participants treated during the intervention period, those at test sites were more likely than those at control sites to report being abstinent at the 2-month (16.4% versus 5.8%; adjusted OR = 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.9 to 5.6; P<.001) and 6-month (15.4% versus 9.8%; adjusted OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.2 to 2.6; P =.009) follow-up assessments and to report continuous abstinence, that is, abstinence at both 2 and 6 months (10.9% versus 3.8%; adjusted OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.8 to 6.3; P<.001).

conclusionImplementation of a guideline-based smoking cessation intervention by intake clinicians in primary care is associated with higher abstinence among smokers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedConfidence IntervalsCounselingFamily PracticeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInternal MedicineMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioOffice VisitsPatient Education as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID15100337
PMCPMC7666639
OpenAlexW2118094121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.