Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15099123›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2004

Measuring treatment preferences and willingness to pay for docetaxel in advanced ovarian cancer.

George Dranitsaris, Julia Elia-Pacitti, Wayne Cottrell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

George DranitsarisAugmentium Pharma Consulting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. george@augmentium.com
Julia Elia-Pacitti
Wayne Cottrell
Augmentium Pharma Consulting (Canada) · CACancer Institute (WIA) · INSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDocetaxel is an equally active alternative to paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer but has a different adverse effect profile. Whilst paclitaxel is associated with less haematological toxicity, such as febrile neutropenia and anaemia, docetaxel causes less sensory and motor neuropathy.

objectiveTo measure the economic value and preference scores for docetaxel as an alternative to paclitaxel in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. DESIGN AND

settingA cost-benefit analysis using a consumer-based willingness-to-pay (WTP) approach was conducted. The study population consisted of a patient surrogate sample comprised of 80 oncology pharmacists and nurses from eight Canadian provinces. Background information on ovarian cancer was provided including its current management, and differences in adverse effects between docetaxel and paclitaxel. Respondents were then asked what their preferred product would be if they were diagnosed with ovarian cancer and how much they would be willing to pay per cycle for six cycles in the form of a co-payment (i.e. user's fee) for the product of their choice. The maximum willingness to pay for docetaxel was then compared against the incremental cost (acquisition and administration) of the drug. STUDY PERSPECTIVE: Canadian healthcare system perspective. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND

resultsThe WTP survey instrument was simple to administer and easily understood by participants. Respondents ranked motor neuropathy as being the most unpleasant adverse effect of treatment. Of the sample, 63.8% preferred to use docetaxel instead of paclitaxel (p = 0.075). The patient surrogate sample was willing to pay a mean of 64 Canadian dollars (dollars Can; 2003 values) [95% CI dollars Can33, dollars Can92] per cycle for the benefits offered by docetaxel as an alternative to paclitaxel. This estimate was marginally lower than the incremental cost of dollars Can87 per cycle of docetaxel.

conclusionA substantial portion of Canadian patients with ovarian cancer would likely prefer to be treated with docetaxel instead of paclitaxel for the management of their disease and would be willing to pay a portion of the incremental cost. Therefore, both options should be offered to patients, and selection of treatment can be based on reducing the risk of the toxicity that concerns the patient the most.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEconomics, PharmaceuticalQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAdultAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCanadaDocetaxelFemaleHumansIncomeMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPaclitaxelRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexTaxoidsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDocetaxelPaclitaxelTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID15099123
OpenAlexW2118851499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.