Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15098133›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2004

Passive hinge forces in the feeding apparatus of Aplysia aid retraction during biting but not during swallowing.

G P Sutton, J B Macknin, S S Gartman, G P Sunny, R D Beer, P E Crago, D M Neustadter, H J Chiel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Soft-surface grasping: radular opening inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Muscle function in animal movement: passive mechanical properties of leech muscle.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2007
    Article
  14. Neuromechanics of multifunctionality during rejection in Aplysia californica.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2006
    Article
  15. Mechanical reconfiguration mediates swallowing and rejection in Aplysia californica.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2006
    Article
  16. Neuromechanics of coordination during swallowing in Aplysia californica.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2006
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

G P SuttonDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7080, USA.
J B Macknin
S S Gartman
G P Sunny
R D Beer
P E Crago
D M Neustadter
H J Chiel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swallowing and biting responses in the marine mollusk Aplysia are both mediated by a cyclical alternation of protraction and retraction movements of the grasping structure, the radula and underlying odontophore, within the feeding apparatus of the animal, the buccal mass. In vivo observations demonstrate that Aplysia biting is associated with strong protractions and rapid initial retractions, whereas Aplysia swallowing is associated with weaker protractions and slower initial retractions. During biting, the musculature joining the radula/odontophore to the buccal mass (termed the "hinge") is stretched more than in swallowing. To test the hypothesis that stretch of the hinge might contribute to rapid retractions observed in biting, we analyzed the hinge's passive properties. During biting, the hinge is stretched sufficiently to assist retraction. In contrast, during swallowing, the hinge is not stretched sufficiently for its passive forces to assist retraction, because the odontophore's anterior movement is smaller than during biting. A quantitative model demonstrated that steady-state passive forces were sufficient to generate the retraction movements observed during biting. Experimental measures of the relative magnitude of the hinge's active and passive forces at the protraction displacements of biting suggest that passive forces are at least a third of the total force.

Indexed as

AnimalsAplysiaBiomechanical PhenomenaDeglutitionEatingFeeding BehaviorMouth

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.