ArticleHuman genetics2004
Small marker chromosomes in two patients with segmental aneusomy for proximal 17p.
Article in Human genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inconsistency of Karyotyping and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) in a Mosaic Turner Syndrome Case.Global medical genetics · 2020Article
- Nonrecurrent 17p11.2p12 Rearrangement Events that Result in Two Concomitant Genomic Disorders: The PMP22-RAI1 Contiguous Gene Duplication Syndrome.American journal of human genetics · 2015Article
- Mechanisms and consequences of small supernumerary marker chromosomes: from Barbara McClintock to modern genetic-counseling issues.American journal of human genetics · 2008Article
- Characterization of Potocki-Lupski syndrome (dup(17)(p11.2p11.2)) and delineation of a dosage-sensitive critical interval that can convey an autism phenotype.American journal of human genetics · 2007Article
- Genomic disorders: molecular mechanisms for rearrangements and conveyed phenotypes.PLoS genetics · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We report a nine-year-old girl (patient 1934) and a five-year-old boy (patient 2170) with small, de novo supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs) derived from proximal 17p. The clinical features of patient 1934 include developmental delay, triangular face, prominent forehead, low set ears, dental abnormalities, a high arched palate, long, flexible fingers, and joint laxity. Patient 2170 is affected with developmental delay, oral-motor dyspraxia/verbal apraxia, thick upper and lower lips, bilateral fifth finger clinodactyly, joint laxity and mild hypotonia. G-banded chromosome analysis of patient 1934 revealed mosaicism for a SMC in 72% of peripheral lymphocytes analyzed, whereas analysis of patient 2170 identified a smaller SMC present in 100% of cells analyzed. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies demonstrated that both of the SMCs derived from 17p10-p11.2. Using FISH and array-CGH analysis, the proximal breakpoints mapped within the centromere and the distal breakpoints were both located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) common deletion region. We compare the clinical characteristics of our patients with those previously reported to have either SMC including 17p or duplications of proximal 17p in an effort to further delineate the phenotype of trisomy 17p10-p11.2 and to elucidate genotype-phenotype correlations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.