ArticleBMC biotechnology2004
Site-specific genomic (SSG) and random domain-localized (RDL) mutagenesis in yeast.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overexpression of Mdm36 reveals Num1 foci that mediate dynein-dependent microtubule sliding in budding yeast.Journal of cell science · 2020Article
- A CDC25 family protein phosphatase gates cargo recognition by the Vps26 retromer subunit.eLife · 2017Article
- Targeted in Situ Mutagenesis of Histone Genes in Budding Yeast.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
- The dynein cortical anchor Num1 activates dynein motility by relieving Pac1/LIS1-mediated inhibition.The Journal of cell biology · 2015Article
- Identifying cis-regulatory changes involved in the evolution of aerobic fermentation in yeasts.Genome biology and evolution · 2013Article
- A novel patch assembly domain in Num1 mediates dynein anchoring at the cortex during spindle positioning.The Journal of cell biology · 2012Article
- GAL1-SceI directed site-specific genomic (gsSSG) mutagenesis: a method for precisely targeting point mutations in S. cerevisiae.BMC biotechnology · 2011Article
- RNA splicing and debranching viewed through analysis of RNA lariats.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2011Article
- Functional dissection of IME1 transcription using quantitative promoter-reporter screening.Genetics · 2010Article
- Integrated phosphoproteomics analysis of a signaling network governing nutrient response and peroxisome induction.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2010Article
- Article
- Mutagenic inverted repeat assisted genome engineering (MIRAGE).Nucleic acids research · 2009Article
- Expression evolution in yeast genes of single-input modules is mainly due to changes in trans-acting factors.Genome research · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA valuable weapon in the arsenal available to yeast geneticists is the ability to introduce specific mutations into yeast genome. In particular, methods have been developed to introduce deletions into the yeast genome using PCR fragments. These methods are highly efficient because they do not require cloning in plasmids.
resultsWe have modified the existing method for introducing deletions in the yeast (S. cerevisiae) genome using PCR fragments in order to target point mutations to this genome. We describe two PCR-based methods for directing point mutations into the yeast genome such that the final product contains no other disruptions. In the first method, site-specific genomic (SSG) mutagenesis, a specific point mutation is targeted into the genome. In the second method, random domain-localized (RDL) mutagenesis, a mutation is introduced at random within a specific domain of a gene. Both methods require two sequential transformations, the first transformation integrates the URA3 marker into the targeted locus, and the second transformation replaces URA3 with a PCR fragment containing one or a few mutations. This PCR fragment is synthesized using a primer containing a mutation (SSG mutagenesis) or is synthesized by error-prone PCR (RDL mutagenesis). In SSG mutagenesis, mutations that are proximal to the URA3 site are incorporated at higher frequencies than distal mutations, however mutations can be introduced efficiently at distances of at least 500 bp from the URA3 insertion. In RDL mutagenesis, to ensure that incorporation of mutations occurs at approximately equal frequencies throughout the targeted region, this region is deleted at the same time URA3 is integrated.
conclusionSSG and RDL mutagenesis allow point mutations to be easily and efficiently incorporated into the yeast genome without disrupting the native locus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.