Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15090068›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2004

Site-specific genomic (SSG) and random domain-localized (RDL) mutagenesis in yeast.

Misa Gray, Martin Kupiec, Saul M Honigberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Targeted in Situ Mutagenesis of Histone Genes in Budding Yeast.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Misa GrayDivision of Cell Biology and Biophysics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA. graymi@umkc.edu
Martin Kupiec
Saul M Honigberg
University of Missouri–Kansas City · USTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

MECHANISM(S) CONTROLLING GROWTH/MEIOSIS SWITCH IN YEASTR01GM058013 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI HONIGBERG, SAUL M · 1998 to 2002
$555k
Gene Regulatory Codes and Signal/Regulatory Element Interactions in IME2R15GM080710 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI HONIGBERG, SAUL M · 2007 to 2009
$268k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058013NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM58013NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM080710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA valuable weapon in the arsenal available to yeast geneticists is the ability to introduce specific mutations into yeast genome. In particular, methods have been developed to introduce deletions into the yeast genome using PCR fragments. These methods are highly efficient because they do not require cloning in plasmids.

resultsWe have modified the existing method for introducing deletions in the yeast (S. cerevisiae) genome using PCR fragments in order to target point mutations to this genome. We describe two PCR-based methods for directing point mutations into the yeast genome such that the final product contains no other disruptions. In the first method, site-specific genomic (SSG) mutagenesis, a specific point mutation is targeted into the genome. In the second method, random domain-localized (RDL) mutagenesis, a mutation is introduced at random within a specific domain of a gene. Both methods require two sequential transformations, the first transformation integrates the URA3 marker into the targeted locus, and the second transformation replaces URA3 with a PCR fragment containing one or a few mutations. This PCR fragment is synthesized using a primer containing a mutation (SSG mutagenesis) or is synthesized by error-prone PCR (RDL mutagenesis). In SSG mutagenesis, mutations that are proximal to the URA3 site are incorporated at higher frequencies than distal mutations, however mutations can be introduced efficiently at distances of at least 500 bp from the URA3 insertion. In RDL mutagenesis, to ensure that incorporation of mutations occurs at approximately equal frequencies throughout the targeted region, this region is deleted at the same time URA3 is integrated.

conclusionSSG and RDL mutagenesis allow point mutations to be easily and efficiently incorporated into the yeast genome without disrupting the native locus.

Indexed as

Genome, FungalMutagenesisGenes, FungalGenetic EngineeringPoint MutationPolymerase Chain ReactionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Deletion

Identifiers

PMID15090068
PMCPMC406509
OpenAlexW1570169904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.