Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15087486›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2004

Differential evolution of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DUP240 paralogs and implication of recombination in phylogeny.

V Leh-Louis, B Wirth, L Despons, S Wain-Hobson, S Potier, J L Souciet

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V Leh-LouisLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique, FRE 2326 Université Louis Pasteur/CNRS, Institut de Botanique, F-67083 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
B Wirth
L Despons
S Wain-Hobson
S Potier
J L Souciet
Génétique Moléculaire Génomique Microbiologie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multigene families are observed in all genomes sequenced so far and are the reflection of key evolutionary mechanisms. The DUP240 family, identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain S288C, is composed of 10 paralogs: seven are organized as two tandem repeats and three are solo ORFs. To investigate the evolution of the three solo paralogs, YAR023c, YCR007c and YHL044w, we performed a comparative analysis between 15 S.cerevisiae strains. These three ORFs are present in all strains and the conservation of synteny indicates that they are not frequently involved in chromosomal reshaping, in contrast to the DUP240 ORFs organized in tandem repeats. Our analysis of nucleotide and amino acid variations indicates that YAR023c and YHL044w fix mutations more easily than YCR007c, although they all belong to the same multigene family. This comparative analysis was also conducted with five arbitrarily chosen Ascomycetes-specific genes and five arbitrarily chosen common genes (genes that have a homolog in at least one non-Ascomycetes organism). Ascomycetes-specific genes appear to be diverging faster than common genes in the S.cerevisiae species, a situation that was previously described between different yeast species. Our results point to the strong contribution, during DNA sequence evolution, of allelic recombination besides nucleotide substitution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyBase SequenceChromosome MappingDNA, FungalMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyMutationRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNASequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15087486
PMCPMC407815
OpenAlexW2117020554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.