Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15085428›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2004

Haemodynamic effects of erythrocyte transfusion in preterm infants.

Jaana A Leipälä, Talvikki Boldt, Vineta Fellman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaana A LeipäläHospital for Children and Adolescents, PL 281, Helsinki University Hospital, HUS 00290 Helsinki, Finland. jaana.leipala@hus.fi
Talvikki Boldt
Vineta Fellman
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe aim of the study was to assess the short-term cardiorespiratory effects of a standard red cell transfusion in very low birth weight (< 1500 g) infants undergoing intensive care. A total of 37 infants (birth weight 920 +/- 230 g, gestational age 27.8 +/- 2.1 weeks, age at study 6.1 +/- 3.9 days) with indwelling arterial lines were studied when 10 ml/kg of packed donor red cells were transfused based on clinical judgment. Infants with patent ductus arteriosus and/or inotropic treatment were excluded from the study. Oxygen saturation, left ventricular output, stroke volume, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and capillary refill time were assessed immediately prior to the transfusion and within an hour after the transfusion was completed. Capillary refill time after the transfusion was significantly shorter than prior to the transfusion (2.1 +/- 0.9 versus 2.4 +/- 1.0 s, P = 0.033). Left ventricular output, stroke volume and arterial pressures remained unaltered. Oxygen saturation after the transfusion was lower than before the transfusion (94.0 +/- 3.8 versus 95.3 +/- 2.5%, P = 0.014) despite unaltered oxygen supply.

conclusionthe data suggest that although a red cell transfusion of 10 ml/kg may marginally improve peripheral perfusion, it does not influence cardiac output and arterial blood pressure in normotensive preterm infants. It may, however, cause a transient decrease in oxygen saturation.

Indexed as

Erythrocyte TransfusionBlood PressureElectrocardiographyHemodynamicsHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightOxygen ConsumptionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID15085428
OpenAlexW2019205336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.