Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15085166›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2004

Technique for intrapartum administration of surfactant without requirement for an endotracheal tube.

John Kattwinkel, Melinda Robinson, Barry T Bloom, Paula Delmore, James E Ferguson

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Update of minimally invasive surfactant therapy.Korean journal of pediatrics · 2017
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John KattwinkelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Box 800386, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Melinda Robinson
Barry T Bloom
Paula Delmore
James E Ferguson
University of Virginia · USWesley Medical Center · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of administering surfactant into the nasopharynx during delivery, thus permitting the baby to aspirate the solution into the fluid-filled airway as an air-fluid interface is established. This process avoids the endotracheal intubation (ETI) and positive pressure ventilation (PPV) usually associated with prophylaxis, thus avoiding the pulmonary barotrauma associated with the conventional method of surfactant administration. STUDY

designIn all, 23 neonates weighing 560 to 1804 g and born at 27 to 30 weeks had their nasopharyngeal airways suctioned and then 3.0-4.5 ml Infasurf instilled into the nasopharynx before delivery of the shoulders. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 10 cmH(2)O was administered by mask as the babies initiated breathing. Nasal CPAP at 6 cmH(2)O was then continued for a minimum of 48 hours.

resultsIn all, 13 of 15 babies delivered vaginally were weaned quickly to room air and required no further surfactant or endotracheal intubation for RDS. Five of eight babies delivered by C-section required subsequent endotracheal intubation soon after birth and two received subsequent endotracheal tube surfactant.

conclusionNasopharyngeal surfactant instillation at birth appears to be relatively safe and simple to accomplish, especially for vaginal births. A large randomized clinical trial will be required to determine the efficacy of this technique when compared to prophylaxis by endotracheal intubation and to nCPAP alone.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricInfant, PrematureNasopharynxBiological ProductsContinuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInstillation, DrugIntubation, IntratrachealMalePregnancyRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornBiological Productscalfactant

Identifiers

PMID15085166
OpenAlexW2023023212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.