Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15084504›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2004

Invasion of the central nervous system by intracellular bacteria.

Douglas A Drevets, Pieter J M Leenen, Ronald A Greenfield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Imaging in scrub typhus - a pictorial review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Review
  2. hLife · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Reprogramming of pathogenic strategies inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Intratumoral Microbiome in Head and Neck Paragangliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Clinical Findings ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Douglas A DrevetsDepartment of Medicine, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, USA. douglas-drevets@ouhsc.edu
Pieter J M Leenen
Ronald A Greenfield

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection of the central nervous system (CNS) is a severe and frequently fatal event during the course of many diseases caused by microbes with predominantly intracellular life cycles. Examples of these include the facultative intracellular bacteria Listeria monocytogenes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Brucella and Salmonella spp. and obligate intracellular microbes of the Rickettsiaceae family and Tropheryma whipplei. Unfortunately, the mechanisms used by intracellular bacterial pathogens to enter the CNS are less well known than those used by bacterial pathogens with an extracellular life cycle. The goal of this review is to elaborate on the means by which intracellular bacterial pathogens establish infection within the CNS. This review encompasses the clinical and pathological findings that pertain to the CNS infection in humans and includes experimental data from animal models that illuminate how these microbes enter the CNS. Recent experimental data showing that L. monocytogenes can invade the CNS by more than one mechanism make it a useful model for discussing the various routes for neuroinvasion used by intracellular bacterial pathogens.

Indexed as

BacteriaBloodCentral Nervous System Bacterial InfectionsEndothelial CellsHumansNeuronsPhagocytes

Identifiers

PMID15084504
PMCPMC387409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.