GuidelineAnnals of family medicine
Screening for family and intimate partner violence: recommendation statement.
Guideline in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identifying children exposed to maltreatment: a systematic review update.BMC pediatrics · 2020Pooled it
- A systematic review of quality of reporting in registered intimate partner violence studies: where can we improve?Journal of injury & violence research · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Article
- Intimate partner violence and health system response in Nekemte town, Western Oromia, Ethiopia, 2019: A cross-sectional study.SAGE open medicine · 2022Article
- Neo-Hippocratic healthcare policies: professional or industrial healthcare delivery? A choice for doctors, patients, and their organisations.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Cochrane in CORR (®): Screening Women for Intimate Partner Violence in Healthcare Settings (Review).Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2016Review
- Discussions about intimate partner violence during prenatal care in the United States: the role of race/ethnicity and insurance status.Maternal and child health journal · 2014Article
- Policymaking Under Uncertainty: Routine Screening for Intimate Partner Violence.Violence against women · 2014Article
- Elder abuse and neglect versus parricide.International journal of high risk behaviors & addiction · 2013Article
- Ethical complexities of screening for depression and intimate partner violence (IPV) in intervention studies.BMC public health · 2011Article
- Racial bias in child protection? A comparison of competing explanations using national data.Pediatrics · 2011Article
- Current trends and update on injury prevention.International journal of critical illness and injury science · 2011Article
- Partner abuse or violence, parenting and neighborhood influences on children's behavioral problems.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2010Article
- Screening for domestic violence among adult women in the United States.Journal of general internal medicine · 2007Article
- Physical and sexual violence during pregnancy and after delivery: a prospective multistate study of women with or at risk for HIV infection.American journal of public health · 2006Article
- How much health promotion and disease prevention is enough?: should chiropractic colleges focus on efficacy training in screening for family violence?The Journal of chiropractic education · 2006Article
- How and why community hospital clinicians document a positive screen for intimate partner violence: a cross-sectional study.BMC family practice · 2005Article
- Interpersonal partner violence and women in the United States: an overview of prevalence rates, psychiatric correlates and consequences and barriers to help seeking.International journal of law and psychiatryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This statement summarizes the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations on screening for family and intimate partner violence based on the USPSTF's examination of evidence specific to family and intimate partner violence. It updates the 1996 recommendations contained in the Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, second edition. In 1996, the USPSTF found insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of specific instruments to detect domestic violence (a "C" recommendation according to 1996 grade definitions). The Task Force now uses an explicit process in which the balance of benefits and harms is determined exclusively by the quality and magnitude of the evidence. As a result, current letter grades are based on different criteria than those in 1996. Current explanations of the ratings and of the strength of overall evidence are given in Appendix A and in Appendix B, respectively. The complete information on which this statement is based, including evidence tables and references, is available in the summary article and in the Systematic Evidence Review, "Screening for Family and Intimate Partner Violence: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force." The USPSTF recommendations, the accompanying summary article, and complete Systematic Evidence Review are available through the USPSTF web site (http://www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov). The summary article and the USPSTF recommendation statement are available in print through the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse (call 1-800-358-9295 or e-mail ahrqpubs@ahrq.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.