Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15083194›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2004

Correlation of amplification and overexpression of the c-myc oncogene in high-grade breast cancer: FISH, in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemical analyses.

J Blancato, B Singh, A Liu, D J Liao, R B Dickson

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Michael Acceptors as Anti-Cancer Compounds: Coincidence or Causality?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. All eyes on Eya: A unique transcriptional co-activator and phosphatase in cancer.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

J BlancatoInstitute for Molecular and Human Genetics, 3970 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA. blancatj@georgetown.edu
B Singh
A Liu
D J Liao
R B Dickson
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USGeorgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USVince Lombardi Cancer Clinic · USWayne State University · US

Funding

EGF FAMILY INDUCTION OF MAMMARY HYPERPLASIAS AND TUMORSR01CA072460 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DICKSON, ROBERT B. · 1997 to 2000
$235k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA072460NCI NIH HHS R01 CA72460NIA NIH HHS AG1496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we analysed gene amplification, RNA expression and protein expression of the c-myc gene on archival tissue specimens of high-grade human breast cancer, using fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH), nonradioactive in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry. The specific question that we addressed was whether expression of c-Myc mRNA and protein were correlated with its gene copy amplification, as determined by FISH. Although c-Myc is one of the most commonly amplified oncogenes in human breast cancer, few studies have utilised in situ approaches to directly analyse the gene copy amplification, RNA transcription and protein expression on human breast tumour tissue sections. We now report that by using the sensitive FISH technique, a high proportion (70%) of high-grade breast carcinoma were amplified for the c-myc gene, irrespective of status of the oestrogen receptor. However, the level of amplification was low, ranging between one and four copies of gene gains, and the majority (84%) of the cases with this gene amplification gained only one to two copies. Approximately 92% of the cases were positive for c-myc RNA transcription, and essentially all demonstrated c-myc protein expression. In fact, a wide range of expression levels were detected. Statistically significant correlations were identified among the gene amplification indices, the RNA expression scores and protein expression scores. c-myc gene amplification, as detected by FISH, was significantly associated with expression of its mRNA, as measured by the intensity of in situ hybridisation in invasive cells (P=0.0067), and by the percentage of invasive cells positive for mRNA expression (P=0.0006). c-myc gene amplification was also correlated with the percentage of tumour cells which expressed high levels of its protein, as detected by immunohistochemistry in invasive cells (P=0.0016). Thus, although multiple mechanisms are known to regulate normal and aberrent expression of c-myc, in this study, where in situ methodologies were used to evaluate high-grade human breast cancers, gene amplification of c-myc appears to play a key role in regulating expression of its mRNA and protein.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenes, mycHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ HybridizationIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRNAProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRNA

Identifiers

PMID15083194
PMCPMC2409705
OpenAlexW2044695669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.