Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15080794›Full record

ReviewThe Biochemical journal2004

Charting gene regulatory networks: strategies, challenges and perspectives.

Gong-Hong Wei, De-Pei Liu, Chih-Chuan Liang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Biochemical journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Genomic Insight into the Role of lncRNA in Cancer Susceptibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Prokaryotic genome regulation: a revolutionary paradigm.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Unravelling the world of cis-regulatory elements.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2007
    Review
  13. Data mining through simulation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2007
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Genomes, phylogeny, and evolutionary systems biology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gong-Hong WeiNational Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 5 Dong Dan San Tiao, Beijing 100005, PR China.
De-Pei Liu
Chih-Chuan Liang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the foremost challenges in the post-genomic era will be to chart the gene regulatory networks of cells, including aspects such as genome annotation, identification of cis-regulatory elements and transcription factors, information on protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions, and data mining and integration. Some of these broad sets of data have already been assembled for building networks of gene regulation. Even though these datasets are still far from comprehensive, and the approach faces many important and difficult challenges, some strategies have begun to make connections between disparate regulatory events and to foster new hypotheses. In this article we review several different genomics and proteomics technologies, and present bioinformatics methods for exploring these data in order to make novel discoveries.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationGenomicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID15080794
PMCPMC1133755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.