Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15080763›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2004

Pharmacokinetic enhancement of protease inhibitor therapy.

Jennifer R King, Heather Wynn, Richard Brundage, Edward P Acosta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Viral protease inhibitors.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2009
    Review
  20. Pharmacologic aspects of new antiretroviral drugs.Current infectious disease reports · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer R KingDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0019, USA.
Heather Wynn
Richard Brundage
Edward P Acosta
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

PEDIATRIC AIDS CLINICAL TRIALS GROUP--COORDINATE/OPERATEU01AI041089 · NIAID · SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. · PI SPECTOR, STEPHEN A · 1997 to 2005
$71.9M
WOMEN'S HEALTH AGENDAU01AI027661 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BALFOUR, HENRY H. · 1988 to 2008
$13.4M
WOMEN'S HEALTH AGENDAU01AI032775 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAAG, MICHAEL S. · 1992 to 2007
$12.9M
NIAID NIH HHS AI 27661NIAID NIH HHS UO1 AI-32775NIAID NIH HHS UO1 AI-41089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combination antiretroviral therapy with two or more protease inhibitors has become the standard of care in the treatment of HIV infection. Dual protein inhibitor (PI) regimens, such as lopinavir/ritonavir, are commonly used as initial PI therapy. As viral resistance increases and the development of mechanistically novel protease inhibitors decreases, clinicians turn to ritonavir-enhanced dual PI therapy to treat salvage patients. Potency of these combination regimens is increased while pill burden, food restrictions and often, side effects are decreased. These clinical advantages result from the enhancement of their pharmacological properties, including alterations in the absorption and metabolism process. Alterations in the absorption and metabolism of protease inhibitors when co-administered with a cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme inhibitor, such as low dose ritonavir, are reflected by impressive changes in pharmacokinetic parameters. For example, the addition of ritonavir 100 or 200 mg to saquinavir 1200-1800 mg has been shown to increase saquinavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by approximately 300-800% compared with saquinavir alone. The ability of ritonavir to increase plasma trough concentrations (C(min)) of concomitantly administered PIs is perhaps the greatest clinical benefit of dual or ritonavir-enhanced dual PI therapy since inadequate concentrations of antiretrovirals may support long term antiretroviral resistance. For example, lopinavir 400mg alone in healthy volunteers produced plasma concentrations that briefly exceeded the concentration required to inhibit 50% of viral replication (IC(50)). Yet, when low doses of ritonavir were added, C(min) values were 50- to 100-fold greater than the concentration required to produce 50% of the maximum effect for wild-type HIV (EC(50)). The following manuscript will discuss the rationale for combining protease inhibitors and will review pertinent pharmacokinetic and clinical data on these combination regimens.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsArea Under CurveDrug InteractionsDrug Therapy, CombinationHalf-LifeHIV InfectionsHumansProtease InhibitorsAnti-HIV AgentsProtease Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID15080763
OpenAlexW2013703413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.