ReviewCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry2004
Partial agonists for A(3) adenosine receptors.
Review in Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploration of chalcones and related heterocycle compounds as ligands of adenosine receptors: therapeutics development.Molecular diversity · 2022Review
- Nucleotide P2YPurinergic signalling · 2020Article
- Purine derivatives as ligands for A3 adenosine receptors.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2005Review
- 2-Substituted adenosine derivatives: affinity and efficacy at four subtypes of human adenosine receptors.Biochemical pharmacology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selective agonists for A(3) adenosine receptors (ARs) could potentially be therapeutic agents for a variety of disorders, including brain and heart ischemic conditions, while partial agonists may have advantages over full agonists as a result of an increased selectivity of action. A number of structural determinants for A(3)AR activation have recently been identified, including the N(6)-benzyl group, methanocarba substitution of ribose, 2-chloro and 2-fluoro substituents, various 2'- and 3'-substitutions and 4'-thio substitution of oxygen. The 2-chloro substitution of CPA and R-PIA led to A(3) antagonism (CCPA) and partial agonism (Cl-R-PIA). 2-Chloroadenosine was a full agonist, while 2-fluoroadenosine was a partial agonist. Both 2'- and 3'- substitutions have a pronounced effect on its efficacy, although the effect of 2'-substitution was more dramatic. The 4-thio substitution of oxygen may also diminish efficacy, depending on other substitutions. Both N(6)-methyl and N(6)-benzyl groups may contribute to the A(3) affinity and selectivity; however, an N(6)-benzyl group but not an N(6)-methyl group diminishes A(3)AR efficacy. N(6)-benzyl substituted adenosine derivatives have similar potency for human and rat A(3)ARs while N(6)-methyl substitution was preferable for the human A(3)AR. The combination of 2-chloro and N(6)-benzyl substitutions appeared to reduce efficacy further than either modification alone. The A(2A)AR agonist DPMA was shown to be an antagonist for the human A(3)AR. Thus, the efficacy of adenosine derivatives at the A(3)AR appears to be more sensitive to small structural changes than at other subtypes. Potent and selective partial agonists for the A(3)AR could be identified by screening known adenosine derivatives and by modifying adenosine and the adenosine derivatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.