Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15078174›Full record

ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2004

Trends in the development of new antidepressants. Is there a light at the end of the tunnel?

Pal Pacher, Valeria Kecskemeti

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Synthesis of Novel Pyrido[1,2-International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Design, synthesis, molecular modelling andRoyal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pal PacherNational Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, Laboratory of Physiologic Studies, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. ppacher@lycos.com
Valeria Kecskemeti
National Institutes of Health · USSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the introduction of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) in mid-1950's, treatment of depression has been dominated by monoamine hypotheses. The well-established clinical efficacy of TCAs and MAOIs is due, at least in part, to the enhancement of noradrenergic or serotonergic mechanisms, or to both. Unfortunately, their very broad mechanisms of action also include many unwanted effects related to their potent activity on cholinergic, adrenergic and histaminergic receptors. The introduction of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) over twenty years ago had been the next major step in the evolution of antidepressants to develop drugs as effective as the TCAs but of higher safety and tolerability profile. During the past two decades SSRIs (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, citalopram) gained incredible popularity and have become the most widely prescribed medication in the psychiatric practice. The evolution of antidepressants continued resulting in introduction of selective and reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitors (eg. moclobemid), selective noradrenaline (eg. reboxetine), dual noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (milnacipram, venlafaxin, duloxetin) and drugs with distinct neurochemical profiles such as mirtazapine, nefazadone and tianeptine. Different novel serotonin receptor ligands have also been intensively investigated. In spite of the remarkable structural diversity, most currently introduced antidepressants are 'monoamine based'. Furthermore, these newer agents are neither more efficacious nor rapid acting than their predecessors and approximately 30% of the population do not respond to current therapies. By the turn of the new millennium, we are all witnessing a result of innovative developmental strategies based on the better understanding of pathophysiology of depressive disorder. Several truly novel concepts have emerged suggesting that the modulation of neuropeptide (substance P, corticotrophin-releasing factor, neuropeptide Y, vasopressin V1b, melanin-concentrating hormone-1), N-methyl-D-aspartate, nicotinic acetylcholine, dopaminergic, glucocorticoid, delta-opioid, cannabinoid and cytokine receptors, gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) and intracellular messenger systems, transcription, neuroprotective and neurogenic factors, may provide an entirely new set of potential therapeutic targets, giving hope that further major advances might be anticipated in the treatment of depressive disorder soon. The goal of this review is to give a brief overview of the major advances from monoamine-based treatment strategies, and particularly focus on the new emerging approaches in the treatment of depression.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressive DisorderDrug DesignHumansModels, BiologicalMolecular StructureAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID15078174
PMCPMC2495050
OpenAlexW1967435433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.