Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15073071›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

Lessons from the central Hampshire electronic health record pilot project: evaluation of the electronic health record for supporting patient care and secondary analysis.

Hugh Sanderson, Trina Adams, Martin Budden, Chris Hoare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. 'Never heard of it'- understanding the public's lack of awareness of a new electronic patient record.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Electronic health records should support clinical research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hugh SandersonWinchester and Eastleigh Healthcare Trust, Winchester, Southampton SO22 5DG. hugh.sanderson@hiowha.nhs.uk
Trina Adams
Martin Budden
Chris Hoare

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Medical Records Systems, ComputerizedComputer SecurityConfidentialityEmergency Medical ServicesEnglandHumansPilot ProjectsState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID15073071
PMCPMC387482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.