Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15071031›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Comparison of two widely used PCR primer systems for detection of toxoplasma in amniotic fluid, blood, and tissues.

Elisabeth Chabbert, Laurence Lachaud, Lucien Crobu, Patrick Bastien

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prenatal education for congenital toxoplasmosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Enhancing the detection ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Seromolecular assess ofEXCLI journal · 2019
    Article
  7. Performance of 2 Polymerization Protocols Targeting Cloned Toxoplasma Parasites.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2018
    Article
  8. Pathology, clinical signs, and tissue distribution ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth ChabbertLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Montpellier, France.
Laurence Lachaud
Lucien Crobu
Patrick Bastien
Human Genetic of Infectious Diseases · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PCR diagnosis of toxoplasmosis suffers from lack of standardization. Interlaboratory comparative studies of PCR methods have been performed, but intralaboratory comparisons are scarce. Here, we optimized and compared the technical performances of two PCR primer systems widely used for Toxoplasma detection. The differences between the two methods were visible only at low parasite concentrations (< or = 1 Toxoplasma genome per reaction tube). Nevertheless, when clinical samples were tested, both methods significantly differed in their technical sensitivities and specificities. Only one method appeared adequate for samples containing blood or tissue.

Indexed as

DNA PrimersAmniotic FluidAnimalsBloodDNA, ProtozoanFemaleHumansMiceOrgan SpecificityPlacentaPolymerase Chain ReactionPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticSensitivity and SpecificityToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisDNA PrimersDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID15071031
PMCPMC387537
OpenAlexW2098230064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.