Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15071002›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Practical strategies for performance optimization of the enhanced gen-probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test.

A Sloutsky, L L Han, B G Werner

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recent advances in diagnostic microbiology.Seminars in hematology · 2009
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification of Mycobacterium species by secA1 sequences.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A SloutskyMassachusetts State Laboratory Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02130, USA. alex.sloutsky@state.ma.us
L L Han
B G Werner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The enhanced Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct (MTD) test was evaluated using a combined set of 338 acid-fast smear-positive and smear-negative, respiratory and nonrespiratory clinical specimens received by the Massachusetts State Tuberculosis Laboratory from September 1999 through March 2002. Microbiological culture was used as the reference method; therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of the MTD test were calculated for culture-positive specimens only. The initial assessment indicated that the overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the MTD test for all specimens grouped together were 62, 98, 99, and 68%, respectively. A detailed discrepancy analysis revealed that two major factors causing negative MTD results in specimens that were culture positive for M. tuberculosis complex were patient treatment with antituberculosis drugs prior to testing and the presence of inhibitory substances in the specimen. Based on these findings, a protocol for optimizing MTD test performance in this setting is proposed in which (i) specimens from patients taking antituberculosis medications are excluded from testing and (ii) all initially MTD-negative or MTD-equivocal specimens are subjected to testing for inhibitors. If this strategy was followed, the MTD test sensitivity would be at least 91%, a significant improvement over the initial sensitivity of 62%. Accordingly, the negative predictive value would increase from 68 to 91%.

Indexed as

Culture MediaHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificitySputumTuberculosisTuberculosis, PulmonaryCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID15071002
PMCPMC387570
OpenAlexW2145108978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.