Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15070755›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2004

Circle-to-circle amplification for precise and sensitive DNA analysis.

Fredrik Dahl, Johan Banér, Mats Gullberg, Maritha Mendel-Hartvig, Ulf Landegren, Mats Nilsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. EMS Mutation and SNP Detection in IntracellularbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cell-Free Production Systems in Droplet Microfluidics.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fredrik DahlThe Beijer Laboratory, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Se-75185 Uppsala, Sweden.
Johan Banér
Mats Gullberg
Maritha Mendel-Hartvig
Ulf Landegren
Mats Nilsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a tightly controlled process for strand-specific amplification of circularized DNA molecules. Tandem repeated complements of DNA circles are generated by rolling-circle replication, and converted to monomer circles of opposite polarity to that of the starting material. These circles are then subjected to one more round of rolling-circle replication and circularization, and the process can be further repeated. The method can be directed to produce single-stranded circular or linear monomers, or linear concatemers of the desired polarity. The reaction is not product inhibited, and can yield approximately 100-fold higher concentrations of monomer products than PCR. Each generation of the amplification process proceeds in a linear fashion, ensuring precise quantification. The procedure is suitable for parallel amplification of large numbers of DNA circles, because the few cycles and the robust reaction mechanism preserves the proportion of amplified molecules. We demonstrate the utility of the method for multiplexed genotyping of polymorphic loci and for quantitative DNA analysis.

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNADNA, CircularDNA ReplicationGene AmplificationGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationDNADNA, Circular

Identifiers

PMID15070755
PMCPMC384784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.