Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15070750›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2004

Tying synaptonemal complex initiation to the formation and programmed repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Kiersten A Henderson, Scott Keeney

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rewiring Meiosis for Crop Improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. DNA Helicase Mph1Developmental cell · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evidence ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kiersten A HendersonMolecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Scott Keeney
Cornell University · USHarvard University Press · US

Funding

Mechanism of meiotic recombination in yeastR01GM058673 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI KEENEY, SCOTT · 1999 to 2015
$6.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM58673NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During meiosis, homologous chromosomes recombine and become closely apposed along their lengths within the synaptonemal complex (SC). In part because Spo11 is required both to make the double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate recombination and to promote normal SC formation in many organisms, it is clear that these two processes are intimately coupled. The molecular nature of this linkage is not well understood, but it has been proposed that SC formation initiates locally at the sites of ongoing recombination and in particular at the subset of sites that will eventually give rise to crossovers. To test this hypothesis, we examined further the relationship between DSBs and SC formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. SCs were monitored in a series of spo11 missense mutants with varying DSB frequencies. Alleles that blocked DSB formation gave SC phenotypes indistinguishable from a deletion mutant, and partial loss-of-function mutations with progressively more severe DSB defects caused corresponding defects in SC formation. These results strongly correlate SC formation with Spo11 catalytic activity per se. Numbers of Zip3 complexes on chromosomes, thought to represent the sites of SC initiation, also declined when Spo11 activity decreased, but in a markedly nonlinear fashion: hypomorphic spo11 alleles caused larger defects in DSB formation than in Zip3 complex formation. This nonlinear response of Zip3 closely paralleled the response of crossover recombination products. The quantitative relationship between Zip3 foci, SC formation, and crossing over strongly implicates crossover-designated recombination intermediates as the sites of SC initiation.

Indexed as

ChromatinDNA DamageDNA RepairDNA ReplicationGenotypeMutation, MissenseSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSynapsesSynaptonemal ComplexChromatin

Identifiers

PMID15070750
PMCPMC384779
OpenAlexW2119615258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.