Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15069024›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

Impact of nurse practitioners on workload of general practitioners: randomised controlled trial.

Miranda G H Laurant, Rosella P M G Hermens, Jozé C C Braspenning, Bonnie Sibbald, Richard P T M Grol

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Involving patients in cardiovascular risk management with nurse-led clinics: a cluster randomized controlled trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Interprofessional team-based primary care practice and preventive cancer screening: evidence from Family Health Teams in Ontario, Canada.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Benefits of Advanced Practice Nursing for Its Expansion in the Spanish Context.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Pharmacists' perceptions of their emerging general practice roles in UK primary care: a qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Change in UK government must not mean widespread removal of GPs.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miranda G H LaurantCentre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands. m.laurant@wok.umcn.nl
Rosella P M G Hermens
Jozé C C Braspenning
Bonnie Sibbald
Richard P T M Grol

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the impact on general practitioners' workload of adding nurse practitioners to the general practice team.

designRandomised controlled trial with measurements before and after the introduction of nurse practitioners.

setting34 general practices in a southern region of the Netherlands.

participants48 general practitioners.

interventionFive nurses were randomly allocated to general practitioners to undertake specific elements of care according to agreed guidelines. The control group received no nurse.

main outcome measuresObjective workload, derived from 28 day diaries, included the number of contacts per day for each of three conditions (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, dementia, cancer), by type of consultation (in practice, telephone, home visit), and by time of day (surgery hours, out of hours). Subjective workload was measured by using a validated questionnaire. Outcomes were measured six months before and 18 months after the intervention.

resultsThe number of contacts during surgery hours increased in the intervention group compared with the control group (P < 0.06), particularly for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma (P < 0.01). The number of consultations out of hours declined slightly in the intervention group compared with the control group, but this difference did not reach significance. No significant changes became apparent in subjective workload.

conclusionAdding nurse practitioners to general practice teams did not reduce the workload of general practitioners, at least in the short term. This implies that nurse practitioners are used as supplements, rather than substitutes, for care given by general practitioners.

Indexed as

Family PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansNetherlandsNurse PractitionersOffice VisitsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforceWorkload

Identifiers

PMID15069024
PMCPMC390208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.