Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15064693›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2004

High-dose chemotherapy using BEAM for tumor debulking without stem cell support followed by early allogeneic reduced intensity conditioning transplantation to induce a graft-versus-lymphoma effect in patients with high risk or refractory lymphoma.

A S Buser, D Heim, C Bucher, A Tichelli, A Gratwohl, J R Passweg

Abstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A S BuserStem Cell Transplantation Team, Basel University Hospitals, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.
D Heim
C Bucher
A Tichelli
A Gratwohl
J R Passweg
University Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with refractory lymphoma, we tested the hypothesis that high-dose chemotherapy (BEAM) without stem cell support followed by a reduced intensity (RIC) allogeneic transplant with fludarabine and 2 Gy TBI 28 days later results in tumor debulking and establishment of a graft vs lymphoma effect, with acceptable toxicity. In a pilot protocol we treated 10 patients, 22-62 (median 47) years of age with high-risk or refractory Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Donors were HLA identical siblings (eight) or unrelated volunteers. None died during the neutropenic phase after BEAM which lasted up to the RIC HSCT. The duration of neutropenia was 31-43 (median 36) days. All patients engrafted and nine achieved CR. All developed acute GvHD (median grade III) and all patients at risk developed chronic GvHD. Three patients died of GvHD. One relapsed and six patients are in continuous CR 10-32 (median 15) months after HSCT. This approach appears feasible and results in a high response rate. Neutropenia duration is of concern. It remains to be tested whether separation of debulking chemotherapy and induction of allogeneic effects confers an advantage.

Indexed as

Graft vs Tumor EffectAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic AgentsDisease ProgressionDrug TherapyFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHodgkin DiseaseHumansLymphomaLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleMiddle AgedNeutropeniaPrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsfludarabineVidarabine

Identifiers

PMID15064693
OpenAlexW2011878783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.