Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15060013›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

Regulatory potential scores from genome-wide three-way alignments of human, mouse, and rat.

Diana Kolbe, James Taylor, Laura Elnitski, Pallavi Eswara, Jia Li, Webb Miller, Ross Hardison, Francesca Chiaromonte

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Do regulatory regions matter in FOXG1 duplications?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Polymorphisms in CTNNBL1 in relation to colorectal cancer with evolutionary implications.International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diana KolbeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
James Taylor
Laura Elnitski
Pallavi Eswara
Jia Li
Webb Miller
Ross Hardison
Francesca Chiaromonte

Funding

SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING BIOSEQUENCE DATAR01HG002238 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI MILLER, WEBB COLBY · 2000 to 2010
$7.8M
Genomic Alignment to Detect Conserved Regulatory RegionsF32HG002325 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI ELNITSKI, LAURA L · 2001 to 2003
$141k
NHGRI NIH HHS F32 HG002325NHGRI NIH HHS HG-02238NHGRI NIH HHS HG02325NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We generalize the computation of the Regulatory Potential (RP) score from two-way alignments of human and mouse to three-way alignments of human, mouse, and rat. This requires overcoming technical challenges that arise because the complexity of the models underlying the score increases exponentially with the number of species. Despite the close evolutionary proximity of rat to mouse, we find that adding the rat sequence increases our ability to predict genomic sites that regulate gene transcription. A variant of the RP scoring scheme that accounts for local variation in neutral mutational patterns further improves our predictions.

Indexed as

GenomeGenome, HumanActinsAnimalsCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-alphaComputational BiologyDNAEnhancer Elements, GeneticEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationHumansMiceRatsRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence AlignmentActinsCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-alphaDNA

Identifiers

PMID15060013
PMCPMC383316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.