ArticleGenome research2004
Evolution and comparative genomics of odorant- and pheromone-associated genes in rodents.
Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phylogeny, Ecology, and Gene Families Covariation Shaped the Olfactory Subgenome of Rodents.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Vomeronasal Receptors Associated with Circulating Estrogen Processing Chemosensory Cues in Semi-Aquatic Mammals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Divergent evolution and purifying selection of the Type 2 diabetes gene sequences in Drosophila: a phylogenomic study.Genetica · 2020Article
- Distinct evolutionary trajectories of V1R clades across mouse species.BMC evolutionary biology · 2020Article
- Mouse protein coding diversity: What's left to discover?PLoS genetics · 2019Review
- Excreted Steroids in Vertebrate Social Communication.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Review
- Biological function in the twilight zone of sequence conservation.BMC biology · 2017Review
- Selection on Coding and Regulatory Variation Maintains Individuality in Major Urinary Protein Scent Marks in Wild Mice.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Evolution of the insect desaturase gene family with an emphasis on social Hymenoptera.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015Article
- The genomic basis of vomeronasal-mediated behaviour.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2014Review
- Article
- The evolutionary history of the SAL1 gene family in eutherian mammals.BMC evolutionary biology · 2011Article
- Sexual dimorphism in olfactory signaling.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2010Review
- Dynamic evolution of V1R putative pheromone receptors between Mus musculus and Mus spretus.BMC genomics · 2009Article
- Divergent evolution and molecular adaptation in the Drosophila odorant-binding protein family: inferences from sequence variation at the OS-E and OS-F genes.BMC evolutionary biology · 2008Article
- Article
- The animal in the genome: comparative genomics and evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2008Review
- Dynamic instability of the major urinary protein gene family revealed by genomic and phenotypic comparisons between C57 and 129 strain mice.Genome biology · 2008Article
- Evolutionary rate analyses of orthologs and paralogs from 12 Drosophila genomes.Genome research · 2007Article
- Co-regulation of a large and rapidly evolving repertoire of odorant receptor genes.BMC neuroscience · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemical cues influence a range of behavioral responses in rodents. The involvement of protein odorants and odorant receptors in mediating reproductive behavior, foraging, and predator avoidance suggests that their genes may have been subject to adaptive evolution. We have estimated the consequences of selection on rodent pheromones, their receptors, and olfactory receptors. These families were chosen on the basis of multiple gene duplications since the common ancestor of rat and mouse. For each family, codons were identified that are likely to have been subject to adaptive evolution. The majority of such sites are situated on the solvent-accessible surfaces of putative pheromones and the lumenal portions of their likely receptors. We predict that these contribute to physicochemical and functional diversity within pheromone-receptor interaction sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.