Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15059993›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes.

Michael I Jensen-Seaman, Terrence S Furey, Bret A Payseur, Yontao Lu, Krishna M Roskin, Chin-Fu Chen, Michael A Thomas, David Haussler, Howard J Jacob

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 277 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
277citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

277 citing papers in PubMed, 562 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Privacy-preserving pangenome graphs.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Towards an evolutionary baseline model ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Gene-Pseudogene Inversions as a Hidden Source of Missing Heritability.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

217 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael I Jensen-SeamanHuman and Molecular Genetics Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA. mseaman@mcw.edu
Terrence S Furey
Bret A Payseur
Yontao Lu
Krishna M Roskin
Chin-Fu Chen
Michael A Thomas
David Haussler
Howard J Jacob
Medical College of Wisconsin · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USIdaho State University · USTranslational Research Informatics Center (Japan) · JPUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Search for a Hypertensive Renal Failure GeneF32HL070527 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI JENSEN-SEAMAN, MICHAEL IGNATIUS · 2002 to 2004
$102k
NHLBI NIH HHS 1F32HL70527-01NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL070527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Levels of recombination vary among species, among chromosomes within species, and among regions within chromosomes in mammals. This heterogeneity may affect levels of diversity, efficiency of selection, and genome composition, as well as have practical consequences for the genetic mapping of traits. We compared the genetic maps to the genome sequence assemblies of rat, mouse, and human to estimate local recombination rates across these genomes. Humans have greater overall levels of recombination, as well as greater variance. In rat and mouse, the size of the chromosome and proximity to telomere have less effect on local recombination rate than in human. At the chromosome level, rat and mouse X chromosomes have the lowest recombination rates, whereas human chromosome X does not show the same pattern. In all species, local recombination rate is significantly correlated with several sequence variables, including GC%, CpG density, repetitive elements, and the neutral mutation rate, with some pronounced differences between species. Recombination rate in one species is not strongly correlated with the rate in another, when comparing homologous syntenic blocks of the genome. This comparative approach provides additional insight into the causes and consequences of genomic heterogeneity in recombination.

Indexed as

GenomeGenome, HumanAnimalsBase CompositionChromosomesCrosses, GeneticEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationHumansMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMice, ObeseRatsRats, Inbred BNRats, Inbred SHRRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID15059993
PMCPMC383296
OpenAlexW2147631681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.